Author:
Panah Zahra Yazdi,Mahmoodabadi Hassan Zareei,Dehghani Fahimeh
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
An imaginary companion is an invisible or personified entity created by children for themselves. An imaginary companion typically serves as a companion to the child and plays a significant role in their life, especially for only children who may experience more loneliness compared to other children. This research was conducted to investigate the role of an imaginary companion in the lives of only children.
Method
The present study was conducted using a qualitative method and a content analysis approach. Through purposeful sampling, a total of 34 preschool and primary school children, aged 6 to 9 years, from schools in Mashhad city, were selected until saturation was reached. They were subjected to semi-structured interviews. After data collection, the data were coded, and then the main and sub-themes were extracted.
Results
The research findings were represented in the form of 196 statements, 28 sub-themes, and 9 main themes. The main themes included the role of an imaginary companion in alleviating loneliness, the role of an imaginary companion in amusement, the role of an imaginary companion in emotional regulation, conversations with an imaginary companion, guidance from an imaginary companion for good and bad behaviors, the assistance of an imaginary companion in tasks, helping to generate new scenarios, the advantages of having an imaginary companion, and the disadvantages of having one.
Conclusion
Based on the aforementioned findings, it can be concluded that the presence of an imaginary companion can not only support children but also promote creativity and distance them from the virtual space and realities of the real world. Parental awareness of this matter can aid in the child’s growth, fulfill their needs, and, on the other hand, prevent potential harm to children.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference40 articles.
1. Hosseini H, Nodoushan AA, Moradi N. A comparative study of childbearing desires of Shia and Sunni kurdish women in rural areas of Kamyaran. J Woman Family Stud. 2016;4(1):63–84.
2. Mansour F. Economic insecurity and fertility: does income volatility impact the decision to remain a one-child family? J Fam Econ Issues. 2018;239:243–57.
3. Kertzer DI, White MJ, Bernardi L, Gabrielli G. Italy’s path to very low fertility: the adequacy of economic and second demographic transition theories: le cheminement de l’Italie vers les tres basses fécondités: adéquation des théories économique et de seconde transition démographique. Eur J Population/Revue Européenne De Démographie. 2009;25:89–115.
4. Tavares MB, Fuchs FC, Diligenti F, Abreu JRPD, Rohde LA, Fuchs SC. Behavioral characteristics of the only child vs first-born and children with siblings. Brazilian J Psychiatry. 2004;26:17–23.
5. Kozlowski JF. Adult implications of being an only child. Gen Psychol. 2012:1–25.