Implicit gender-career bias in postgraduate medical training still exists, mainly in residents and in females

Author:

Kramer Maud,Heyligers Ide C.,Könings Karen D.

Abstract

Abstract Background More and more female residents enter postgraduate medical training (PGMT). Meanwhile, women are still underrepresented in academic medicine, in leadership positions and in most surgical specialties. This suggests that female residents’ career development may still be negatively impacted by subtle, often unconscious stereotype associations regarding gender and career-ambition, called implicit gender-career bias. This study explored the existence and strength of implicit gender-career bias in doctors who currently work in PGMT, i.e. in attending physicians who act as clinical trainers and in their residents. Methods We tested implicit gender-career bias in doctors working in PGMT by means of an online questionnaire and an online Implicit Association Test (IAT). We used standard IAT analysis to calculate participants’ IAT D scores, which indicate the direction and strength of bias. Linear regression analyses were used to test whether the strength of bias was related to gender, position (resident or clinical trainer) or specialty (non-surgical or surgical specialty). Results The mean IAT D score among 403 participants significantly differed from zero (D-score = 0.36 (SD = 0.39), indicating bias associating male with career and female with family. Stronger gender-career bias was found in women (βfemale =0 .11; CI 0.02; 0.19; p = 0.01) and in residents (βresident 0.12; CI 0.01; 0.23; p = 0.03). Conclusions This study may provide a solid basis for explicitly addressing implicit gender-career bias in PGMT. The general understanding in the medical field is that gender bias is strongest among male doctors’ in male-dominated surgical specialties. Contrary to this view, this study demonstrated that the strongest bias is held by females themselves and by residents, independently of their specialty. Apparently, the influx of female doctors in the medical field has not yet reduced implicit gender-career bias in the next generation of doctors, i.e. in today’s residents, and in females.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference58 articles.

1. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health at a Glance 2019. OECD Indicators. Figure 8.6 ‘Share of female doctors, 2000 and 2017 (or nearest year)’. Available at http://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/health-at-a-glance-19991312.htm Published on Novermber 7, 2019. Accessed on 30 Oct 2020.

2. Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC Faculty Roster. Table 13: U.S. Medical School Faculty by Sex, Rank, and Department, 2019. https://www.aamc.org/system/files/2020-01/2019Table13.pdf Published December 31, 2019. Accessed 30 Oct 2020.

3. The Dutch Network of Women Professors. Women professors monitor 2019. https://www.lnvh.nl/uploads/moxiemanager/LNVH_monitor2019_EN.pdf Published 2019. Accessed October 30, 2020.

4. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2018 AAMC physician specialty data report. Figure 1.3. ‘Percentage of Active Physicians Who Are Female by Specialty’. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/active-physicians-sex-and-specialty-2017 Published 2018. Accessed 30 Oct 2020.

5. Association of American Medical Colleges. The State of Women in Academic Medicine 2018–2019: Exploring Pathways to Equity. Figure 5: Percentage of Women Residents by Specialty, 2018. https://www.aamc.org/sites/default/files/aa-data-reports-state-of-women-residents-specialty-2018_0.jpg. Published 2020. Accessed 30 Oct 2020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3