Author:
Steen Cathrine W.,Söderström Kerstin,Stensrud Bjørn,Nylund Inger Beate,Siqveland Johan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Virtual reality (VR) training can enhance health professionals’ learning. However, there are ambiguous findings on the effectiveness of VR as an educational tool in mental health. We therefore reviewed the existing literature on the effectiveness of VR training on health professionals’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes in assessing and treating patients with mental health disorders.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO (via Ovid), the Cochrane Library, ERIC, CINAHL (on EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, and the Scopus database for studies published from January 1985 to July 2023. We included all studies evaluating the effect of VR training interventions on attitudes, knowledge, and skills pertinent to the assessment and treatment of mental health disorders and published in English or Scandinavian languages. The quality of the evidence in randomized controlled trials was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. For non-randomized studies, we assessed the quality of the studies with the ROBINS-I tool.
Results
Of 4170 unique records identified, eight studies were eligible. The four randomized controlled trials were assessed as having some concern or a high risk of overall bias. The four non-randomized studies were assessed as having a moderate to serious overall risk of bias. Of the eight included studies, four used a virtual standardized patient design to simulate training situations, two studies used interactive patient scenario training designs, while two studies used a virtual patient game design. The results suggest that VR training interventions can promote knowledge and skills acquisition.
Conclusions
The findings indicate that VR interventions can effectively train health care personnel to acquire knowledge and skills in the assessment and treatment of mental health disorders. However, study heterogeneity, prevalence of small sample sizes, and many studies with a high or serious risk of bias suggest an uncertain evidence base. Future research on the effectiveness of VR training should include assessment of immersive VR training designs and a focus on more robust studies with larger sample sizes.
Trial registration
This review was pre-registered in the Open Science Framework register with the ID-number Z8EDK.
Funder
South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority /Innlandet Hospital Trust, Norway
The Inland University of Applied Sciences, Norway
Inland Norway University Of Applied Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923–58.
2. World Health Organization. eLearning for undergraduate health professional education: a systematic review informing a radical transformation of health workforce development. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
3. Talbot T, Rizzo AS. Virtual human standardized patients for clinical training. In: Rizzo AS, Bouchard S, editors. Virtual reality for psychological and neurocognitive interventions. New York: Springer; 2019. p. 387–405.
4. Merriam-Webster dictionary. Springfield: Merriam-Webster Incorporated; c2024. Virtual reality. Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/virtual%20reality. [cited 2024 Mar 24].
5. Winn W. A conceptual basis for educational applications of virtual reality. Technical Publication R-93–9. Seattle: Human Interface Technology Laboratory, University of Washington; 1993.