Author:
Ishizuka Kosuke,Shikino Kiyoshi,Kasai Hajme,Hoshina Yoji,Miura Saito,Tsukamoto Tomoko,Yamauchi Kazuyo,Ito Shoichi,Ikusaka Masatomi
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The gamification of learning increases student enjoyment, and motivation and engagement in learning tasks. This study investigated the effects of gamification using decision-making cards (DMCs) on diagnostic decision-making and cost using case scenarios.
Method
Thirty medical students in clinical clerkship participated and were randomly assigned to 14 small groups of 2–3 medical students each. Decision-making was gamified using DMCs with a clinical information heading and medical cost on the front, and clinical information details on the back. First, each team was provided with brief clinical information on case scenarios. Subsequently, DMCs depending on the case were distributed to each team, and team members chose cards one at a time until they reached a diagnosis of the case. The total medical cost was then scored based on the number and contents of cards drawn. Four case scenarios were conducted. The quantitative outcomes including confidence in effective clinical decision-making, motivation to learn diagnostic decision-making, and awareness of medical costs were measured before and after our gamification by self-evaluation using a 7-point Likert scale. The qualitative component consisted of a content analysis on the benefits of learning clinical reasoning using DMCs.
Result
Confidence in effective clinical decision-making, motivation to learn diagnostic decision-making, and awareness of medical cost were significantly higher after the gamification. Furthermore, comparing the clinical case scenario tackled last with the one tackled first, the average medical cost of all cards drawn by students decreased significantly from 11,921 to 8,895 Japanese yen. In the content analysis, seven advantage categories of DMCs corresponding to clinical reasoning components were extracted (information gathering, hypothesis generation, problem representation, differential diagnosis, leading or working diagnosis, diagnostic justification, and management and treatment).
Conclusion
Teaching medical students clinical reasoning using DMCs can improve clinical decision-making confidence and learning motivation, and reduces medical cost in clinical case scenarios. In addition, it can help students to acquire practical knowledge, deepens their understanding of clinical reasoning, and identifies several important clinical reasoning skills including diagnostic decision-making and awareness of medical costs. Gamification using DMCs can be an effective teaching method for improving medical students’ diagnostic decision-making and reducing costs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference44 articles.
1. Kassirer JP. Teaching clinical reasoning: case-based and coached. Acad Med. 2010;85:1118–24.
2. Groves M, O’Rourke P, Alexander H. Clinical reasoning: the relative contribution of identification, interpretation and hypothesis errors to misdiagnosis. Med Teach. 2003;25:621–5.
3. Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care; Board on Health Care Services; Institute of Medicine. In: Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, editors. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving diagnosis in Health Care. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2015.
4. Holmboe ES, Durning SJ. Assessing clinical reasoning: moving from in vitro to in vivo. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014;1:111–7.
5. Cooper N, Bartlett M, Gay S, Hammond A, Lillicrap M, Matthan J, Singh M. UK Clinical reasoning in Medical Education (CReME) consensus statement group. Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2021;43:152–9.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献