Author:
Christidis Nikolaos,Lindberg Viveca,Jounger Sofia Louca,Christidis Maria
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Higher education tends to focus on academic writing only, instead of emphasizing that professional texts are also used as a basis for communication in contexts with a variety of participators. When it comes to clinical notes, research is scarce and focused on technology and informatics. Therefore, the aim was to explore dental students’ clinical notes, and specifically which aspects of the clinical notes characterizes clinical notes that are not sufficient enough for professional purposes.
Methods
The object of analysis was the student’s written completion of a teacher constructed protocol regarding oral mucosa, the dental apparatus including pathology on tooth level, oral hygiene, and a validated international clinical examination protocol of the temporomandibular region. The study was framed within the New Literacy Studies approach, and the clinical notes were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results
Within the clinical notes three themes were identified; a) familiar content; b) familiar content in new context; and c) new content. The forms of notes could refer to either categorizational clinical notes or descriptive clinical notes. Most students were able to write acceptable clinical notes when the content was familiar, but as soon as the familiar content was in a new context the students had difficulties to write acceptable notes. When it comes to descriptive notes students suffered difficulties to write acceptable notes both when it came to familiar content, or familiar content in a new context.
Conclusions
Taken together, the results indicate that students have difficulties writing acceptable notes when they are novices to the content or context, making their notes either insufficient, too short or even wrong for professional purposes. With this in mind, this study suggests that there is a need to strengthen the demands on sufficient professional quality in clinical notes and focus on clinical notes already in the early stages of the different medical educations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference37 articles.
1. Moore T, Morton J. The myth of job readiness? Written communication, employability, and the ‘skills gap’in higher education. Stud High Educ. 2017;42(3):591–609.
2. Odell L, Goswami D, Herrington A. The discourse-based interview: a procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in nonacademic settings. Res Writing. 1983;220:236.
3. Karlsson AM. Med språket som arbetsredskap: sju studier av kommunikation i vården: Södertörns högskola; 2012.
4. Lea MR. Academic literacies in theory and practice. In: Street BB, May S, editors. Literacies and language education. Encyclopedia of language and education. 3rd ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 147–58.
5. Lea MR, Stierer B. Student writing in higher education: new contexts. Buckingham: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education; 2000.