Antibiotic prescription errors: the relationship with clinical competence in junior medical residents

Author:

Martínez-Domínguez Joshua,Sierra-Martínez Octavio,Galindo-Fraga Arturo,Trejo-Mejía Juan Andrés,Sánchez-Mendiola Melchor,Ochoa-Hein Eric,Vázquez-Rivera Mirella,Gutiérrez-Cirlos Carlos,Naveja Jesús,Martínez-González Adrián

Abstract

Abstract Background A large portion of prescribing errors can be attributed to deficiencies in medication knowledge. These errors are preventable and most often occur at the time of prescription. Antimicrobials are the drug class most common incorrectly prescribed. Objective To characterize the relationship between clinical competence and antibiotic prescription errors. We also investigated the frequency and severity of antibiotic prescription errors to identify items and attributes of clinical competence which are correlated with the antibiotic prescription error ratio. Method A cross-sectional study was applied to assess clinical competence of junior medical residents in two reference academic hospitals and a regional hospital in Mexico City. It was conducted during February 2019. We used an infectious disease Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) to assess clinical competence and a measure of frequency, and severity of antibiotic prescription errors. Results The number of eligible participants was ~ 255 (hospital meeting attendance), and the number of residents in this study were 51 (~ 20%), 31 were female (60.8%). The mean OSCE score was 0.692 ± 0.073. The inter-item (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.927) and inter-station internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.774). The G coefficient in generalizability theory analysis was 0.84. The antibiotic prescription error ratio was 45.1% ± 7%. The most frequent category of severity of antibiotic prescription errors was category E (errors that may contribute to or result in temporary harm to the patient and require intervention), 235 (65.2%). We observed a negative and significant correlation between clinical competence and antibiotic prescription errors (r = -0.33, p < 0.05, CI95% -0.57 to -0.07), which remained significant after controlling for the effect of gender and time since graduation from medical school (r = -0.39, p < 0.01, CI95% -0.625 to -0.118). Using exploratory factor analysis we identified two factors, which explained 69% of the variance in clinical competence, factor 1 evaluated socio-clinical skills and factor 2 evaluated diagnostic-therapeutic skills. Factor 2 was correlated with antibiotic prescription error ratio (r = -0.536, p < 0.001). Conclusions We observed a negative correlation between clinical competence and antibiotic prescription error ratio in graduated physicians who have been accepted in a medical specialty. The therapeutic plan, which is a component of the clinical competence score, and the prescription skills had a negative correlation with antibiotic prescription errors. The most frequent errors in antibiotic prescriptions would require a second intervention.

Funder

Coordination of Educational Development and Curricular Innovation (CODEIC) of the National Autonomous University of Mexico

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference78 articles.

1. Grober ED, Bohnen JMA. Defining medical error. Can J Surg. 2005;48(1):39–44. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15757035.

2. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Molla S. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000.

3. Norman GR, Eva KW. Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):94–100. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078760.

4. Bobb A, Gleason K, Husch M, Feinglass J, Yarnold PR, Noskin GA. The epidemiology of prescribing errors: the potential impact of computerized prescriber order entry. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(7):785–92. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15078649.

5. Lesar TS, Briceland L, Stein DS. Factors related to errors in medication prescribing. JAMA. Jan [cited 21 Apr 2016];277(4):312–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9002494

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3