Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study
-
Published:2023-06-28
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:
-
ISSN:1472-6920
-
Container-title:BMC Medical Education
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Med Educ
Author:
Liu Xing,Wang Xianxiong,Wu Ying,Yu Haitao,Yang Min,Khoshnood Kaveh,Luo Esther,Wang Xiaomin
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Research ethics provides the ethical standards for conducting sound and safe research. The field of medical research in China is rapidly growing and facing various ethical challenges. However, in China, little empirical research has been conducted on the knowledge and attitudes of medical postgraduates toward research ethics and RECs. It is critical for medical postgraduates to develop a proper knowledge of research ethics at the beginning of their careers. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and attitudes of medical postgraduates toward research ethics and RECs.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July 2021 at a medical school and two affiliated hospitals in south-central China. The instrument of the study was an online survey that was distributed via WeChat.
Results
We found that only 46.7% were familiar with the ethical guidelines for research with human subjects. In addition, 63.2% of participants were familiar with the RECs that reviewed their research, and 90.7% perceived RECs as helpful. However, only 36.8% were fully aware of the functions of RECs. In the meantime, 30.7% believed that review by an REC would delay research and make it more difficult for researchers. Furthermore, most participants (94.9%) believed that a course on research ethics should be mandatory for medical postgraduates. Finally, 27.4% of the respondents considered the fabrication of some data or results to be acceptable.
Conclusion
This paper serves to suggest that research ethics education should be prioritized in medical ethics curriculum, and course syllabi or teaching methods should be revised to provide medical postgraduates with a deeper understanding of the principles, regulations, and specifics of research ethics. We also recommend that RECs provide diverse approaches in their review procedure to facilitate the understanding of medical postgraduates of the functions and processes of RECs and to enhance their awareness of research integrity.
Funder
Changsha Natural Science Foundation, Research on Quality Assessment of Ethics Committees in Medical and Health Institution
Scientific Research Project of Health Commission of Hunan Province
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference43 articles.
1. Masic I, Hodzic A, Mulic S. Ethics in Medical Research and Publication. Int J Prev Med. 2014;5:1073–82.
2. Ayoub NM, Qandil AM, McCutchan JA. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding Research Ethics Committees among Health Care Faculty at two public universities in Jordan. J EMPIR RES HUM RES. 2019;14(4):372–82.
3. Qiao H. A brief introduction to institutional review boards in the United States. PEDIATR INVEST. 2018;2(1):46–51.
4. What is Ethics in Research. & Why is it important? - by David B. Resnik, J.D., ph.D. [Internet]. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; [cited 2022 Nov14]. Available from: https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm.
5. State Food and Drug Administration of the People’s Republic of China. G-ood Clinical Practice. 2003. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/zwgk/wlwl/201105/ebb64ab0d2f84fe08e143c1d0e56244c.shtml. Accessed 15 Nov 2022.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献