Author:
Liu Canying,Lin Jicheng,Wu Siting,Zhu Yingting,Zou Yuxian,Zhang Qi,Li Zhidong,Zhuo Yehong,Li Yiqing
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Non-ophthalmologists often lack sufficient operational training to use a direct ophthalmoscope proficiently, resulting in a global deficit of basic ophthalmological skills among general practitioners. This deficiency hampers the timely diagnosis, referral, and intervention of patients. Consequently, the optimization of teaching tools and methods to enhance teaching efficiency is imperative. This study explores the effectiveness of the Eyesi Direct Ophthalmoscope Simulator (Eyesi) as an innovative tool for fundus examination training.
Methods
Medical undergraduates were randomly assigned to Group A or B (n = 168). All participants completed a pre-training questionnaire. Group A received Eyesi training, while Group B underwent traditional direct ophthalmoscope (TDO) training. Subsequently, participants answered questionnaires relevant to their respective training methods. Both groups exchanged training tools and completed a summary questionnaire.
Results
After training, 54.17% of participants believed that images presented by the Eyesi were consistent with the real fundus. Group A scored significantly higher than Group B in fundus structure recognition and self-confidence in examination. The degree of mastery over fundus theory score increased from 6.10 ± 0.13 to 7.74 ± 0.16 (P < 0.001) in Group A, but Group B did not demonstrate a significant difference. We also compared undergraduates’ tendencies for different learning purposes, 75.59% of participants preferred the Eyesi to TDO as a training tool, and 88.41% of participants were receptive to introducing the Eyesi in training.
Conclusion
According to subjective participant feedback, Eyesi outperformed TDO in fundus observation, operational practice, and theoretical learning. It effectively equips undergraduates with fundus examination skills, potentially promoting the use of direct ophthalmoscopes in primary medical institutions.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Ng VY, Mentock SM, Brantley AB. Examination of the Retina. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(25):2483–4.
2. Ting DS, Sim SS, Yau CW, Rosman M, Aw AT, Yeo IY. Ophthalmology simulation for undergraduate and postgraduate clinical education. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(6):920–4.
3. Shields JA. Current approaches to the diagnosis and management of choroidal melanomas. Surv Ophthalmol. 1977;21(6):443–63.
4. Saunders RA, Donahue ML, Berland JE, Roberts EL, Von Powers B, Rust PF. Non-ophthalmologist screening for retinopathy of prematurity. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(2):130–4.
5. Harper CA, O’Day J, Taylor HR. Early detection of diabetic retinopathy. Med J Aust. 1995;162(10):536–8.