Beliefs around the causes of inequities and intergroup attitudes among health professional students before and after a course related to Indigenous Peoples and colonialism

Author:

Melro Carolyn M.ORCID,Matheson Kimberly,Bombay Amy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAddressing the Truth and Reconciliation Calls to Action on including anti-racism and cultural competency education is acknowledged within many health professional programs. However, little is known about the effects of a course related to Indigenous Peoples and colonialism on learners’ beliefs about the causes of inequities and intergroup attitudes.MethodsA total of 335 learners across three course cohorts (in 2019, 2020, 2022) of health professional programs (e.g., Dentistry/Dental Hygiene, Medicine, Nursing, and Pharmacy) at a Canadian university completed a survey prior to and 3 months following an educational intervention. The survey assessed gender, age, cultural identity, political ideology, and health professional program along with learners’ causal beliefs, blaming attitudes, support for social action and perceived professional responsibility to address inequities. Pre-post changes were assessed using mixed measures (Cohort x Time of measurement) analyses of variance, and demographic predictors of change were determined using multiple regression analyses. Pearson correlations were conducted to assess the relationship between the main outcome variables.ResultsOnly one cohort of learners reported change following the intervention, indicating greater awareness of the effects of historical aspects of colonialism on Indigenous Peoples inequities, but unexpectedly, expressed stronger blaming attitudes and less support for government social action and policy at the end of the course. When controlling for demographic variables, the strongest predictors of blaming attitudes towards Indigenous Peoples and lower support for government action were gender and health professional program. There was a negative correlation between historical factors and blaming attitudes suggesting that learners who were less willing to recognize the role of historical factors on health inequities were more likely to express blaming attitudes. Further, stronger support for government action or policies to address such inequities was associated with greater recognition of the causal effects of historical factors, and learners were less likely to express blaming attitudes.ConclusionThe findings with respect to blaming attitudes and lower support for government social action and policies suggested that educational interventions can have unexpected negative effects. As such, implementation of content to address the Truth and Reconciliation Commissions Calls to Action should be accompanied by rigorous research and evaluation that explore how attitudes are transformed across the health professional education journey to monitor intended and unintended effects.

Funder

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Research Nova Scotia

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference67 articles.

1. Adelson N. The embodiment of inequity: Health disparities in Aboriginal Canada. Can J Public Health. 2005;96(2):S45–61 Available from Volume_96-S2.qxp (researchgate.net).

2. Uphoff EP, Pickett KE. The distribution, determinants and root causes of inequalities in well-being. In: Galvin KT, editor. Handbook of Well-Being. London: Routledge; 2018. p. 182–93.

3. Environics Institute. Toward reconciliation: indigenous and non-indigenous perspectives: final report. 2019 [Cited 2022 Oct 26]. Available from: https://www.environicsinstitute.org/projects/project-details/towards-reconciliation-indigenous-and-non-indigenous-perspectives.

4. Allan B, Smylie J. First peoples, second class treatment: the role of racism in the health and well-being of Indigenous peoples in Canada). Toronto: Wellesley Institute; 2015.

5. Godlewska A. M. C, Schaefli L. M, Forcione M, Lamb C, Nelson E, Talan B. Canadian colonialism, ignorance and education. A study of graduating students at Queen’s University. J Pedagogy. 2020;11(1):147–76 Available from: article-p147.xml (sciendo.com).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3