Author:
Ballouk Rouba,Mansour Victoria,Dalziel Bronwen,Hegazi Iman
Abstract
Abstract
Background
A blended learning environment is multifaceted and widely used in medical education. However, there is no validated instrument for exploring students’ learning in a blended learning environment in medical programs. This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for exploring how medical students learn in an undergraduate medical program that employs a blended learning approach.
Method
Using Artino’s seven step approach, we developed a questionnaire to investigate how medical students learn in a blended learning environment. For pilot testing, 120 students completed this 19-item questionnaire. These 19-items were evaluated for construct and convergent validity across an expert medical education panel. Further item testing was analysed with principal component analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation for item reduction and factor estimation. Hence, validity was thoroughly addressed to ensure the questionnaire was representative of the key focus questions. Cronbach’s Alpha was used for item reliability testing, and Spearman’s Rho was used for the correlation between the questionnaire items and the extensively used MSLQ. Hence, validity and reliability were systematically addressed.
Results
Exploratory Factor analysis identified four factors F1 and F3: Resources: Accessibility & Guidance (14-items), F2: Learning behaviours: Social and Contextual (5-items), and F4: Motivational factors: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation (4-items). Internal consistency and reliability tests were satisfactory (Cronbach’s Alpha ranged from 0.764 to 0.770).
Conclusions
The resulting Blended Learning Questionnaire (BLQ) was determined to be a reliable instrument to explore undergraduate medical students’ learning in a blended learning environment.
Funder
Western Sydney University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference31 articles.
1. Allen IE, Seaman J. Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States: ERIC; 2013.
2. van Houten-Schat MA, Berkhout JJ, van Dijk N, Endedijk MD, Jaarsma ADC, Diemers AD. medical education in review. Med Educ. 2018;52:1008–15.
3. O’Flaherty J, Phillips C, Karanicolas S, Snelling C, Winning T. The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet Higher Educ. 2015;25:85–95.
4. Ifenthaler D. Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem-solving scenarios. Journal of Educ Technol Soc. 2012;15(1):38–52.
5. Zheng B, Zhang Y. Self-regulated learning: the effect on medical student learning outcomes in a flipped classroom environment. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:1–7.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献