Perspectives of general practitioners towards their supervisors over the past ten years in China

Author:

xin Rao,Li Luo,Qiaoli Su,Xingyue Wang,Shuangqing Li

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Doctors who wish to become general practitioners (GPs) in China are required to attend and complete general practice resident training. In the early stages of the standardized GP training system, GP training supervisors play important roles. This study aims to explore how GP residents perceive their GP supervisors, factors that affect GP residents’ satisfaction level, as well as to offer suggestions based on the implications of this study. Design We conducted a mixed quantitative and qualitative study. Firstly, with respect to the quantitative research, we conducted a survey to investigate training satisfaction through questionnaires, then extracted and analyzed the factors that influence training satisfaction. In the qualitative study, we conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews using qualitative research criteria (COREQ)––a 32-item checklist for interviews. Participants Participants in the quantitative survey included 1172 GPs whose training time wasbetween 2008 and 2017. Afterwards, 100 participants were selected from this sample , filtered by stratified random sampling and by having provided extreme answers on the quantitative survey (less than 5% of the total sample). They were chosen for the qualitative research to conduct a more detailed investigation., This stratified random sampling was based on residents’ grades, regions, and training levels (city level or county level). Extreme answers were identified as answers of “extremely good” or “extremely bad” to questions from the initial comprehensive survey of 1172 participants. Consequently, 30 participants with extreme answers were found, while the remaining 70 participants in the interviews were selected by stratified random sampling. Ultimately, this sample of participants met our information collection and sample estimation requirements. Results The results show that satisfaction with GP theoretical training supervisors, GP hospital-based training supervisors, and GP community-based training supervisors differed. Considering long-term averages, the hierarchy of satisfaction is as follows: GP theoretical training supervisors > GP community-based training supervisors > GP hospital-based training supervisors. GP hospital-based training supervisors need to improve their conception of GPs, teaching methods and conscientiousness. GP community-based training supervisors need to improve their teaching methods, knowledge of clinical theory and practice ability. Conclusions On the one hand, teams of GP supervisors in China have gradually been established over time. On the other hand,the satisfaction tendencies of residents with respect to their GP supervisors are quite different, and teams of GP supervisors must be promoted and improved.

Funder

Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program

National Steering Committee for Medical Professional Degree Education/Chinese Medical Doctor Association 2021 National General Practice Education and Teaching Research Project

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference22 articles.

1. Wang R, He Z, Zhao W, et al. Research progress of general practice teacher training [J]. Chin Gen Pract. 2017;25:3144-3148.

2. Wang Y, Wang R, Zhang J, et al. Satisfaction study of GPs’ standardized training trainees on general medical science training in general hospitals [J]. Chin Gen Pract. 2018;3:1598-1602.

3. Klemenc-ketis Z, Svab I, Petek-ster M, et al. Twenty-five years of the international Bled course for teachers of family medicine in Europe: Glancing back and looking forward [J]. Eur J Gen Pract. 2016;4:262–6.

4. Hui Yang, Jianjun Han. Team construction of GPs in China: development, challenges and prospects [J]. Chin Gen Pract. 2019;22(19):2267–79.

5. Meli D-N, Ng A, Singer S, et al. General practitioner teachers’ job satisfaction and their medical students’ wish to join the field - a correlational study [J]. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:50.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3