Author:
Gong Linlin,Song Yang,Xu Yingsong,Wang Mingqi,Ma Haiying,Liu Weiwei,Zhu Liang,Li Jian,Luan Man,Chu Wanjiang,Wang Xiuli,Zhou Xin,Wei Wei,Hao Lihong
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundStudents’ engagement with learning materials and discussions with teachers and peers before and after lectures are among the keys to the successful implementation of blended programs. Mixed results have been reported by previous studies on blended learning. This study evaluated the effectiveness of embedding a teacher-supervised online discussion platform in a blended embryology course in terms of its impact on students’ capabilities to handle difficult and cognitively challenging tasks.MethodsTwo forms of blended learning were investigated and compared in this study. Students in the control group (n = 85) learned online materials before each class, followed by classroom instruction and activities in which face-to-face discussion and communication between students were encouraged. Students in the experimental group (n = 83) followed a similar procedure with an additional teacher-supervised online discussion platform to guide, supervise and evaluate their learning progress. All participants were first-year medical students in clinical medicine at Dalian Medical University who had enrolled in 2017. All participants took the final exam to test their learning outcomes.ResultsThe embryology grades of students in the experimental group were significantly higher than those of students in the control group (p = 0.001). Additionally, the scores of students in the experimental group on questions with a high difficulty level (p = 0.003) and questions assessing high-order cognitive skills (p = 0.003) were higher than those of students in the control group; the effect size was moderate (η2 > 0.05).ConclusionsIn blended embryology courses, compared with learner-led and face-to-face discussion, the teacher-supervised online discussion platform has great potential to enable students to achieve higher grades and solve difficult and cognitively challenging tasks.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Kop R, Hill A. Connectivism: learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? Int Rev Res Open Dist Learn. 2008;9(3):1–3.
2. Martyn M. The hybrid online model: good practice. Educ Q. 2005;26(1):18–23.
3. Garrison DR, Kanuka H. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2004;7(2):95–105.
4. Education USDo, Evaluation OOP: Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a Meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. 2010.
5. Ilic D, Hart W, Fiddes P, Misso M, Villanueva E. Adopting a blended learning approach to teaching evidence based medicine: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:169.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献