Author:
Mun Frederick,Scott Alyssa R.,Cui David,Lehman Erik B.,Jeong Seongho,Chisty Alia,Juliano Paul J.,Hennrikus William L.,Hennrikus Eileen F.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 will transition from numeric grading to pass/fail, sometime after January 2022. The aim of this study was to compare how program directors in orthopaedics and internal medicine perceive a pass/fail Step 1 will impact the residency application process.
Methods
A 27-item survey was distributed through REDCap to 161 U.S. orthopaedic residency program directors and 548 U.S. internal medicine residency program directors. Program director emails were obtained from the American Medical Association’s Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database.
Results
We received 58 (36.0%) orthopaedic and 125 (22.8%) internal medicine program director responses. The majority of both groups disagree with the change to pass/fail, and felt that the decision was not transparent. Both groups believe that the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge exam and clerkship grades will take on more importance. Compared to internal medicine PDs, orthopaedic PDs were significantly more likely to emphasize research, letters of recommendation from known faculty, Alpha Omega Alpha membership, leadership/extracurricular activities, audition elective rotations, and personal knowledge of the applicant. Both groups believe that allopathic students from less prestigious medical schools, osteopathic students, and international medical graduates will be disadvantaged. Orthopaedic and internal medicine program directors agree that medical schools should adopt a graded pre-clinical curriculum, and that there should be a cap on the number of residency applications a student can submit.
Conclusion
Orthopaedic and internal medicine program directors disagree with the change of Step 1 to pass/fail. They also believe that this transition will make the match process more difficult, and disadvantage students from less highly-regarded medical schools. Both groups will rely more heavily on the Step 2 clinical knowledge exam score, but orthopaedics will place more importance on research, letters of recommendation, Alpha Omega Alpha membership, leadership/extracurricular activities, personal knowledge of the applicant, and audition electives.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference26 articles.
1. USMLE: Change to Pass/Fail Score Reporting for Step 1. https://www.usmle.org/incus (2020). Accessed 1 Mar 2020.
2. Committee to Evaluate the USMLE Program (CEUP): Comprehensive Review of USMLE: Summary of the Final Report and Recommendations. https://www.usmle.org/pdfs/cru/CEUP-Summary-Report-June2008.pdf (2008). Accessed 1 Mar 2020.
3. National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2018 NRMP Program Director Survey. (2018)https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/NRMP-2018-Program-Director-Survey-for-WWW.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2020.
4. Makhoul AT, Pontell ME, Ganesh Kumar N, Drolet BC. Objective measures needed - Program Directors' perspectives on a pass/fail USMLE step 1. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(25):2389–92. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2006148.
5. Cohn MR, Bigach SD, Bernstein DN, Arguello AM, Patt JC, Ponce BA, et al. Resident selection in the wake of United States medical licensing examination step 1 transition to pass/fail scoring. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(21):865–73. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00359.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献