Abstract
Abstract
Background
Design thinking (DT) competence, a creative problem-solving ability, has been investigated extensively among college students in various professional fields within the western cultures. No instrument, however, is available for assessing DT competence in nursing students, particularly, those in non-western cultures.
Objective
To adapt and validate the use of Creative Synthesis Inventory (CSI) assessing the four components (i.e., visualization, discovery, prototyping, and evaluation) of DT competence in nursing students in Taiwan.
Design
Cross-sectional, mixed methodological design combining qualitative and quantitative strategies.
Participants
A 19-item CSI was administered to a total of 520 nursing students from two campuses of a science and technology university in Taiwan. The data collection was conducted between September 2020 and June 2022.
Methods
The cross-cultural adaptation and validation of CSI-Taiwan was done in two phases: Phase I included content validity check, translation, and cross-cultural adaptation. Phase II involved pilot testing and psychometric evaluation.
Results
A first-order confirmatory factor analysis validated the four-component structure, namely visualization, discovery, prototyping, and evaluation, of an 18-item CSI-Taiwan (model fit indices: χ2/df = 3.953, NNFI = 0.942, CFI = 0.956, TLI = 0.947, SRMR = 0.035, and RMSEA = 0.075). A second-order confirmatory factor analysis further indicated that the four components converged on a unitary construct of DT competence (model fit indices: χ2/df = 4.082, NNFI = 0.935, CFI = 0.949, TLI = 0.940, SRMR = 0.040, and RMSEA = 0.080). Moreover, the CSI-Taiwan also demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity. Together these results validated the construct of DT competence and its components as theorized.
Conclusions
The CSI-Taiwan was a reliable and valid self-report instrument to be used by Taiwanese nursing students.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference40 articles.
1. Foundation ID, Dam RF, Siang TY, Siang TY. What is design thinking and why is it so popular? 2021.
2. Altman M, Huang TT, Breland JY. Peer reviewed: design thinking in health care. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180128.
3. Nusem E, Straker K, Wrigley C. Design outcomes in health and medicine. In E. Nusem, K. Straker, & C. Wrigley, editors. Design innovation for health and medicine (pp.17–21). Palgrave Macmillan.2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4362-3_3.
4. Beaird G, Geis M, Lewis EJ. Design thinking: opportunities for application in nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.007. 115– 118.
5. Moon S, Kim SH. Effects of program to design innovative thinking on professional Socialization for nursing students. Retrieved January.2019;18. http://hdl.handle.net/10755/16910.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献