Author:
Ganotice Fraide,Zheng Binbin,Ng Pauline Yeung,Leung Siu Chung,Barrett Elizabeth Ann,Chan Hoi Yan Celia,Chan Chad W. N.,Chan Kit Wa Sherry,Chan Linda,Chan M. K. Karen,Chan Siu Ling Polly,Chan So Ching Sarah,Chan Esther W. Y.,Chen Julie,Cheuk Yuet Ying Jessica,Chong Yin Kei Doris,Chow Yin Man Amy,Chu Kwok Pui Jody,Chung Hon Yin Brian,Ho Shun Yee Amy,Jen Julienne,Jin Jingwen,Khoo Ui Soon,Lam Ho Yan Angie,Lam May P. S.,Lam Suk Fun Veronica,Lee Pamela Pui-Wah,Lee Jetty Chung-Yung,Leung Chung Yin Feona,Leung Anna K. Y.,Lin Xiang,Liu Rebecca K. W.,Lou Wei Qun Vivian,Luk Pauline,Ng Lai Han Zoe,Ng Yee Man Alina,Ng Tin Wai Terry,See Lok Man Mary,Shen Jiangang,Shen Xiaoai,Szeto Grace,Tam Eliza Y. T.,To Kelvin Kai-Wang,Tso Wan-Yee Winnie,Vackova Dana,Wang Ning,Wang Runjia,Wong Hoi Yan Gloria,Wong K. T. Janet,Wong M. Y. Anita,Wong Yuen Ha Janet,Yuen Kwan Yuk Jacqueline,Yuen Wai Yee Grace,Orlu Mine,Tipoe George L.
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
A partnership model in interprofessional education (IPE) is important in promoting a sense of global citizenship while preparing students for cross-sector problem-solving. However, the literature remains scant in providing useful guidance for the development of an IPE programme co-implemented by external partners. In this pioneering study, we describe the processes of forging global partnerships in co-implementing IPE and evaluate the programme in light of the preliminary data available.
Methods
This study is generally quantitative. We collected data from a total of 747 health and social care students from four higher education institutions. We utilized a descriptive narrative format and a quantitative design to present our experiences of running IPE with external partners and performed independent t-tests and analysis of variance to examine pretest and posttest mean differences in students’ data.
Results
We identified factors in establishing a cross-institutional IPE programme. These factors include complementarity of expertise, mutual benefits, internet connectivity, interactivity of design, and time difference. We found significant pretest–posttest differences in students’ readiness for interprofessional learning (teamwork and collaboration, positive professional identity, roles, and responsibilities). We also found a significant decrease in students’ social interaction anxiety after the IPE simulation.
Conclusions
The narrative of our experiences described in this manuscript could be considered by higher education institutions seeking to forge meaningful external partnerships in their effort to establish interprofessional global health education.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine