Author:
Hajiesmaello Maryam,Hajian Sepideh,Riazi Hedyeh,Majd Hamid Alavi,Yavarian Roya
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Delivering high-quality midwifery services requires a professional, educated and competent workforce. The challenges of clinical training and education for midwives in Iran have prevented midwifery students from fully gaining the clinical competency required of midwifery graduates.
Methods
This qualitative study was conducted to identify and explain the challenges of clinical training for midwives in Iran and to determine their underlying factors within the sociocultural and educational context of this country. Data were collected from a purposive sample in a western province of Iran, which included clinical midwives working in public and private maternity units, midwifery instructors working at educational institutes, and midwifery students. After receiving an ethics approval for the project and informed consent from the participants, data were collected through focus group interviews held with midwifery students (n = 9) and semi-structured interviews held with midwifery instructors (n = 6) and clinical midwives (n = 7). Data were then analyzed using the framework proposed by Graneheim and Lundman using MAXQDA-10.
Findings
The analysis of the data led to two themes: “Discriminatory approach in the health system” and “Professional nature of midwifery”. The noted discrimination was caused by the insecure position of midwives in the health system, inequalities related to education and training opportunities, and the demotivation of midwives. The professional nature of midwifery discussed the community in transition, functional paradoxes and high-risk labor.
Conclusion
The findings revealed numerous challenges facing clinical midwifery education and training in the study setting, which may in part be explained by the sociocultural context of maternity services in Iran. The learning opportunities provided to midwifery students should be improved by making significant revisions to the structure of clinical settings where students are placed. Tackling discrimination against a profession and its students is essential, and it is equally important to value the contributions of midwifery students and midwives to their practice and their efforts to ensure safe maternity care for women and newborns. The quality of the clinical learning environment must therefore be improved for this group, and the active participation of competent and autonomous midwifery instructors in this environment can have a facilitatory role.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference41 articles.
1. Albarran JW, Rosser EA. The challenges facing midwifery educators in sustaining a future education workforce. Midwifery. 2014;30(8):949–55.
2. WHO U: UNFPA, The World Bank. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2008 Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF. UNFPA and The World Bank Geneva: World Health Organization 2010.
3. Bharj KK, Luyben A, Avery MD, Johnson PG, Barger MK, Bick D. An agenda for midwifery education: Advancing the state of the world׳ s midwifery. Midwifery. 2016;33:3–6.
4. Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, Silva DRAD, Downe S, Kennedy HP, Malata A. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. The Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129–45.
5. Thompson JB, Fullerton JT, Sawyer AJ. The International Confederation of Midwives: Global Standards for Midwifery Education (2010) with Companion Guidelines. Midwifery. 2011;27(4):409–16.