Author:
Nasr Ziad G.,Alhaj Moustafa Diala,Dahmani Sara,Wilby Kyle J.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) play a big role in minimizing antimicrobial resistance. Pharmacists are essential members of the health care team and in order for them to fulfill roles on ASP teams and become antimicrobial stewards, they must be prepared adequately by pharmacy schools prior to entry into actual practice. Although programming has been implemented into entry-to-practice programs worldwide, little is known about how students interpret antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) data and arrive at clinical decisions. We aimed to explore students’ cognitive processes and determine how they formulate therapeutic decisions when presented with AMS cases.
Methods
This was a qualitative study conducted using a case study approach, in which a sample (n=20) of pharmacy students was recruited to interpret AMS cases. Semi-structured 1-on-1 interviews were arranged with each participant. A think-aloud procedure with verbal protocol analysis was adopted to determine students’ decision-making processes. Thematic analysis was used to interpret themes from the interview data.
Results
Two themes were interpreted from the data: students’ focus and students’ approach to case interpretation. Students’ focus relates to external factors students consider when interpreting AMS case data and use to make and justify therapeutic decisions including patient-centered factors, drug-related factors, AMS interventions, and pharmacist’s role. Students’ clinical reasoning describes the approach that students use to interpret the data and the decision-making processes they employ to arrive at a clinical decision including a systematic approach versus non-systematic approach.
Conclusions
Students vary in their focus and the cognitive strategies used to interpret AMS cases. Findings support the notion that clinical reasoning and decision-making should be explicitly taught in pharmacy curricula, in order to help students become aware of their own cognitive processes and decision-making abilities.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference40 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance. 2021. Accessed 1 April 2022.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest-threats.html. 2019. Accessed 1 April 2022.
3. Fishman N. Policy statement on antimicrobial stewardship by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33:3223–7.
4. Ernst E, Klepser M, Bosso J, Rybak M, Hermsen E, Segarra-Newnham R, et al. Recommendations for training and certification for pharmacists practicing, mentoring, and educating in infectious diseases pharmacotherapy. Pharmacotherapy. 2009;29:482–8. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.29.1.82.
5. Chahine E, El-Lababidi R, Sourial M. Engaging pharmacy students, residents, and fellows in antimicrobial stewardship. J Pharm Pract. 2015;28(6):585–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190013516506.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献