Author:
Jeppu Ashok Kumar,Kumar Kavitha Ashok,Sethi Ahsan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Modern clinical practice increasingly relies on collaborative, cooperative and team-based approaches for effective patient care. Recently, Jigsaw cooperative learning has gained attention in medical education. There is a need for studies in Southeast Asian context to establish its effectives in developing various core competencies expected of health professionals such as interpersonal, communication, collaborative, and teamwork skills. This current study explores the impact of using Jigsaw Cooperative Learning on undergraduate medical students.
Method
An explanatory mixed method research design was carried out on first year medical students at a private university in Malaysia. In Phase I, a survey was conducted to explore the effectiveness of jigsaw learning. Descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated using SPSS. In Phase II, a focus group interview was conducted to explore their in-depth experiences. Qualitative data were thematically analysed.
Results
Fifty-seven students participated in the survey and seven students took part in the focus group interview. Quantitative data analysis showed a statistically significant improvement in the student’s individual accountability, promotive interaction, positive interdependence, interpersonal skill, communication skill, teamwork skill, critical thinking and consensus building after jigsaw learning sessions. Qualitative data explained their experiences in-depth.
Conclusion
Jigsaw cooperative learning improves collaboration, communication, cooperation and critical thinking among the undergraduate medical students. Educators should use jigsaw learning methods to encourage effective collaboration and team working. Future studies should explore the effectiveness of the jigsaw cooperative learning technique in promoting interprofessional collaboration in the workplace.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference44 articles.
1. Rath VL, Mazotti L, Wilkes MS. A framework to understand the needs of the medical students of the future. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):922–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1769048.
2. Kalet A, Buckvar-Keltz L, Harnik V, Monson V, Hubbard S, Crowe R, Song HS, Yingling S. Measuring professional identity formation early in medical school. Med Teach. 2017;39(3):255–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1270437.
3. Kamei RK, Cook S, Puthucheary J & Starmer CF. 21 st Century Learning in Medicine: Traditional Teaching versus Team-based Learning. Med Sci Educ. 2012; 22(2):57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341758
4. General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s doctors: Outcomes for undergraduate Medical education. In Genaral Medical Council London. 2018. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/dc11326-outcomes-for-graduates-2018_pdf-75040796.pdf
5. Malaysian Qualifications Agency. Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF) 2nd Edition. 2017. https://www.mqa.gov.my/new/document/mqf/2021/MQF%20Ed%202%2002102019%20updated%2017022021.pdf.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献