Author:
Seidler Zac E.,Benakovic Ruben,Wilson Michael J.,Davis Jasmine M.,Sheldrake Michelle,McGee Margaret A.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
While there have been calls over the last 15 years for the inclusion of training in sex and gender-based medicine in medical school curricula and to sustain such improvements through a more gender responsive health system, little progress has been made. A related objective of the Australian National Men’s Health Strategy (2020-30) is to improve practitioner core learning competencies in men’s health as a critical step to reducing the burden of disease in men and disparities between men in health care access and outcomes. The aim of this study was therefore to obtain Australian medical student perspectives on the extent to which men’s health and sex and gender-based medicine education is delivered in their curricula, their preparedness for engaging with men in clinical practice, and the men’s health content they would have found useful during their training.
Methods
Eighty-three students (48% male) from 17 accredited medical schools, and in at least their fourth year of training, completed an online survey. The survey was co-designed by a multidisciplinary team of men’s health researchers and clinicians, alongside a student representative. A mix of quantitative and qualitative survey items inquired about students’ preparedness for men’s health clinical practice, and coverage of men’s health and sex- and gender-based medicine in their curricula.
Results
Most students reported minimal to no men’s health coverage in their medical school education (65%). While few were offered optional men’s health units (10.5%), the majority would have liked more formal training on the topic (78%). Accompanying qualitative findings substantiated a lack of preparedness among medical students to engage male patients, likely stemming from minimal coverage of men’s health in their medical education.
Conclusions
Australian medical students may feel underprepared for contemporary men’s health clinical practice, as well as, albeit to a lesser extent, women’s health clinical practice. There is a clear need and desire amongst medical students to enhance curricula with sex and gender-based medicine training.
Funder
Australian Government Department of Health and Movember Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. AIHW. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2019. Australian Burden of Disease Study: impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2015. Australian Burden of Disease series no. 19. Cat. no. BOD 22. Canberra: AIHW. Published online 2019. Accessed 02 Mar 2023.
2. Hawkes S, Allotey P, Elhadj AS, Clark J, Horton R. The Lancet Commission on gender and Global Health. Lancet (London England). 2020;396:521–2.
3. Smith JA, Watkins DC, Griffith DM. Equity, gender and health: new directions for global men’s health promotion. Heal Promot J Aust. 2020;31:161–5.
4. Baker P, Shand T. Men’s health: time for a new approach to policy and practice? J Glob Health. 2017;7:010306.
5. Giorgianni SJ, Porche DJ, Williams ST, Matope JH, Leonard BL. Developing the discipline and practice of comprehensive men’s health. Am J Men’s Health. 2013;7:342–9.