Disclosing medical errors: how do we prepare our students?

Author:

Swinfen Dirkie,Labuschagne Mathys,Joubert Gina

Abstract

AbstractPurposeDespite patient safety initiatives, medical errors remain common and devastating. Disclosing errors is not only ethical, but also promotes restoration of the doctor-patient relationship. However, studies show active avoidance of error disclosure and the need for explicit training. In the South African setting, sparse information exists in terms of undergraduate medical training in error disclosure. To address this knowledge gap, the training of error disclosure in an undergraduate medical programme was examined, against the background of the available literature. The objective was to formulate a strategy to improve error disclosure teaching and practice, with the goal of improving patient care.MethodsFirstly, the literature was reviewed regarding the training of medical error disclosure. Secondly, the undergraduate medical training in error disclosure was probed, by looking at the pertinent findings from a broader study on undergraduate communication skills training. The design of the study was descriptive and cross-sectional. Anonymous questionnaires were distributed to all fourth- and fifth-year undergraduate medical students. Data were predominantly analysed quantitatively. Open-ended questions were analysed qualitatively using grounded theory coding.ResultsOut of 132 fifth-year medical students, 106 participated (response rate 80.3%), while 65 out of 120 fourth-year students participated (response rate 54.2%). Of these participants, 48 fourth-year students (73.9%) and 64 fifth-year students (60.4%) reported infrequent teaching in the disclosure of medical errors. Almost half of the fourth-year students (49.2%) considered themselves novices in error disclosure, while 53.3% of fifth-year students rated their ability as average. According to 37/63 (58.7%) fourth-year students and 51/100 (51.0%) fifth-year students, senior doctors seldom or never modelled patient-centred care in the clinical training setting. These results resonated with the findings of other studies that showed lack of patient-centredness, as well as insufficient training in error disclosure, with resultant low confidence in this skill.ConclusionThe study findings confirmed a dire need for more frequent experiential training in the disclosure of medical errors, in undergraduate medical education. Medical educators should view errors as learning opportunities to improve patient care and model error disclosure in the clinical learning environment.

Funder

Health and Welfare Sector Education and Training Authority

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. Ahsani-Estahbanati E, Gordeev VS, Doshmangir L. Interventions to reduce the incidence of medical error and its financial burden in health care systems: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Front Med. 2022;27:9:875426.

2. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

3. Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. Br Med J. 2000;320(7237):726–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.726.

4. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030. Towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. 2021. https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/patient-safety/policy/global-patient-safety-action-plan (accessed 28 July 2022).

5. South African Department of Health. National guideline for patient safety incident reporting and learning in the public health sector of South Africa. 2017. https://test.idealhealthfacility.org.za/App/Document/Download/53 (accessed 28 July 2022).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Patient Needs: A Communication Map;Improving Clinical Communication;2024

2. Wrong-route drug administration errors: A review of the literature;South African Medical Journal;2023-12-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3