Author:
Potvin Marie-Christine,Morales Alexis N.,West Erin K.,Kalimi Mika,Coviello Jeanne M.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Role-emerging settings – those where occupational therapy (OT) services have not traditionally been provided – are common sites for practice placements of entry-level occupational therapy students. A growing body of literature has attempted to determine the value and drawbacks of such practice placements on the professional preparedness of OT students with mixed findings. Benefits have been identified, including increased cultural understanding, advocacy, creativity, initiative, and problem-solving skills. However, OT students have been reported to perceive such placement as limiting their professional growth and preparedness to practice compared to traditional placements.
Methods
A phenomenological study was conducted seeking the perceptions of OT students (n = 14) about their clinical placement at a role-emerging site. Recorded semi-structured interviews were conducted by trained interviewers within two weeks of the end of clinical placement. The recordings were transcribed verbatim and then coded using an iterative multi-coder inductive approach. Inter-coder agreement, reflectivity, and audit trail were maintained.
Results
Three themes emerged from the analysis: (1) integrating independence and support, (2) becoming occupational therapists, and (3) filling a gap. These themes reflect students’ positive perceptions of their role-emerging clinical placement. They felt that this placement allowed them to develop self-confidence and professional identity as occupational therapists and learn new skills while simultaneously filling a gap in services for clients. Most importantly, they felt that this placement prepared them for their future OT practice.
Conclusion
This finding and their resounding support of the experience suggest that OT students can perceive role-emerging placement as a solid foundation for clinical practice. Factors, included in this placement, that may have contributed to their experience include the level of support provided, time available for learning including space to make mistakes, and freedom from productivity and payor requirements.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. World Federation of Occupational Therapists. Minimum standards for education of occupational therapist revised 2016. World Federation of Occupational Therapists; 2016 [cited 2021 May 30]. Available from: https://www.wfot.org/assets/resources/COPYRIGHTED-World-Federation-of-Occupational-Therapists-Minimum-Standards-for-the-Education-of-Occupational-Therapists-2016a.pdf. Accessed Dec 2022.
2. 2018 accreditation council for occupational therapy education (ACOTE®) standards and interpretive guide (Effective July 31, 2020). Occup Ther Educ. 2018 Nov 19;72(2):7212410005p1–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.72s217.
3. American Occupational Therapy Association. COE guidelines for an occupational therapy fieldwork experience-Level II [Internet]. American Occupational Therapy Association; 2012 [cited 2021 Jun 01]. Available from: https://www.aota.org/-/media/corporate/files/educationcareers/educators/fieldwork/levelii/coe-guidelines-for-an-occupational-therapy-fieldwork-experience-level-ii-final.pdf
4. Hunter H, Volkert A. Issues and challenges of role-emerging placements. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin. 2016;73(1):57–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2016.1162485. Cited 2021 Jun 01.
5. Clarke C, Martin M, Sadlo G, de-Visser R. The development of an authentic professional identity on role-emerging placements. British J Occup Ther. 2014;77(5):222–9. https://doi.org/10.4276/030802214x13990455043368. Cited 2021 June 01.