Author:
Ateudjieu Jerome,Tchio-Nighie Ketina Hirma,Kemta Lekpa Fernando,Koutio Douanla Ingrid Marcelle,Kiadjieu Dieumo Frank Forex,Ntsekendio Paul Nyibio,Naah Felicité,Bekolo Cavin Epie,Bisseck Anne Cecile
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Researchers are responsible for the protection of health research participants. The purpose of this study was to identify and prioritize the training needs of researchers involved in human health research in Cameroon.
Methods
It was a cross-sectional study conducted in all the Cameroon regions in the last quarter of 2020. It targeted researchers involved in human health research selected by systematic stratified sampling from health and training institutions, and health facilities. Data were collected using a face-to-face administered questionnaire deployed in Smartphones via the ODK-collect. The distribution of participants’ exposure to research ethics training was described as well as their knowledge on the related regulatory texts. A score was used to rank the training needs identified by the participants.
Results
Of 168 reached participants, 134 (79.76%) participated in the study. A total of 103 (76.87%) researchers reported having received training in human health research ethics and 98 (73.13%) perceived need of training in research ethics. Of those involved in clinical, vaccine, and field trials, 63.64, 33.33, 52.53% have been exposed respectively to related training regarding participants’ protection. Having received at least one training in research ethics significantly increase the proportion of researchers systematically submitting application for ethical evaluation prior to implementation (OR = 3.20 (1.31–7.78)). Training priorities identified by researchers include: guidelines and regulations on health research ethics and research participant’s protection in Cameroon, procedures for evaluating research protocols, protection of research participants in clinical trials, and fundamental ethics principles.
Conclusion
The coverage of researchers in training regarding research participant protection remains limited in a number of areas including those related to clinical trial participant protection and research participant protection in Cameroon. Improving this coverage and addressing perceived needs of researchers are expected to contribute in improving their ability in playing their role in research participant protection.
Funder
European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference20 articles.
1. Nass SJ, Levit LA, Gostin LO. Rule I of M (US) C on HR and the P of HITHP. In: The Value, Importance, and Oversight of Health Research. Washington: National Academies Press (US); 2009. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9571/. Accessed 9 May 2022.
2. Omonzejele PF. Ethical challenges posed by the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa. J Bioethical Inq. 2014;11(4):417–20.
3. Muthuswamy V. Ethical issues in clinical research. Perspect Clin Res. 2013;4(1):9–13.
4. Ortiz-Prado E, Simbaña-Rivera K, Gómez-Barreno L, Tamariz L, Lister A, Baca JC, et al. Potential research ethics violations against an indigenous tribe in Ecuador: a mixed methods approach. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):100.
5. The World Medical Association-. Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed 9 May 2022.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献