Author:
Jiang Yinan,Wei Jing,Shi Lili,Cao Jinya,Zhu Boheng,Hong Xia
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Although patient-centred medical services are widely recognized and accepted, how to define and evaluate them remains a controversial topic.
Objectives
This study attempts to evaluate the underlying structure of the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) with a homogenous population and clarify the connotation of patient-centredness.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study, 279 7th year Chinese medical students in were selected to examine the internal structure of the PPOS by means of internal consistency, exploratory, and confirmatory factor analyses.
Results
Both the two-factor model and the four-factor model showed acceptable internal consistency and structural validity. The four-factor model that endorsed the implicit attitude towards the doctor–patient relationship outperformed the two-factor model in terms of adaptability.
Conclusions
The PPOS has good psychometric attributes, as evaluated by Chinese medical students. This article attempts to explore patient-centredness from the perspective of implicit attitudes that affect the doctor–patient relationship and resummarizes the four factors. These four dimensions may suggest a deeper attitude towards the doctor–patient relationship, while “sharing information” or “caring about” the “patient” is the behaviour and preference expressed on the basis of these four attitudes, which is the result rather than the cause.
Practice implications
Understanding the underlying attitudes towards the doctor–patient relationship can help to construct a patient-centred medical service concept and improve the doctor–patient relationship in medical education courses and the system design of medical activities.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference52 articles.
1. America, I.O.M.C. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Qual Manag Healthc. 2002;10:1192.
2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Patient-centred care: improving quality and safety through partnerships with patients and consumers. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2011.
3. Håkansson Eklund J, Holmström IK, Kumlin T, Kaminsky E, Skoglund K, Höglander J, et al. Same same or different? A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102:3–11.
4. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: National Academies Press; 2001.
5. McMillan SS, Kendall E, Sav A, King MA, Whitty JA, Kelly F, et al. Patient-centered approaches to health care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70:567–96.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献