Peer evaluations of group work in different years of medical school and academic achievement: how are they related?

Author:

Linn Zayar,Tashiro Yasura,Morio Kunimasa,Hori Hiroki

Abstract

Abstract Background To develop the skills needed in health care teams, training communication and teamwork skills are important in medical education. Small group collaborative learning is one of the methods utilized in such trainings, and peer evaluation is suggested to be useful in reinforcing the effectiveness of group learning activities. In Mie University Faculty of Medicine, group work consisting of book review sessions of liberal arts education in the first grade and problem-based learning (PBL) sessions in preclinical years were conducted using the same peer evaluation system that included three domains: degree of prior learning, contribution to group discussion, and cooperative attitude. This study was conducted to determine the relationships among behaviors during group work and the academic achievement of medical students. Methods With the data from a cohort of medical students in three consecutive academic years (n = 340), peer evaluation scores in groupworks of book review sessions, those in PBL sessions and paper test scores of preclinical years were analyzed. The correlations were analyzed with Spearman’s correlation coefficient, and the respective scores were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed-ranked test. Results Significant correlations were observed among the evaluation scores of respective domains in group work and paper test scores. The degree of prior learning had the strongest relationship among the three domains (rs = 0.355, p < 0.001 between book review sessions and PBL; rs = 0.338, p < 0.001 between book review sessions and paper test score; rs = 0.551, p < 0.001 between PBL and paper test score). Peer evaluation scores of respective domains were found to be significantly higher in PBL. Conclusion Medical students maintained their groupwork behaviors to some extent from early school to preclinical years. Those behaviors were positively related to their academic achievement in the later years of the medical education curriculum. Our study highlighted the importance of the early introduction of group work. The results will be useful to motivate medical students to put more effort into group work.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. General Medical Council. Outcomes for graduates (Tomorrow’s doctors). Manchester: General Medical Council; 2015. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/Outcomes_for_graduates_Jul_15_1216.pdf_61408029.pdf. Accessed: 14 Apr 2021

2. Smith KA, Sheppard SD, Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-based practices. J Eng Educ. 2005;94(1):87–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x.

3. Edmunds S, Brown G. Effective small group learning: AMEE Guide no. 48. Med Teach. 2010;32(9):715–26. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.505454.

4. Chūō kyōiku shingikai [Central Council for Education]. Atarashī jidai ni okeru kyōyō kyōiku no arikata ni tsuite (tōshin) [Liberal Arts Education in the New Era (Report)]. 2002. http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo0/toushin/020203/020203a.htm#08 (in Japanese). Accessed: 2 Apr 2019.

5. Ogasawara M. Status quo of the higher education in Europe and the United States of America (a quick report). J High Educ (Hokkaido Univ). 1996;1:293–5 (in Japanese).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3