Author:
Linn Zayar,Tashiro Yasura,Morio Kunimasa,Hori Hiroki
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To develop the skills needed in health care teams, training communication and teamwork skills are important in medical education. Small group collaborative learning is one of the methods utilized in such trainings, and peer evaluation is suggested to be useful in reinforcing the effectiveness of group learning activities. In Mie University Faculty of Medicine, group work consisting of book review sessions of liberal arts education in the first grade and problem-based learning (PBL) sessions in preclinical years were conducted using the same peer evaluation system that included three domains: degree of prior learning, contribution to group discussion, and cooperative attitude. This study was conducted to determine the relationships among behaviors during group work and the academic achievement of medical students.
Methods
With the data from a cohort of medical students in three consecutive academic years (n = 340), peer evaluation scores in groupworks of book review sessions, those in PBL sessions and paper test scores of preclinical years were analyzed. The correlations were analyzed with Spearman’s correlation coefficient, and the respective scores were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed-ranked test.
Results
Significant correlations were observed among the evaluation scores of respective domains in group work and paper test scores. The degree of prior learning had the strongest relationship among the three domains (rs = 0.355, p < 0.001 between book review sessions and PBL; rs = 0.338, p < 0.001 between book review sessions and paper test score; rs = 0.551, p < 0.001 between PBL and paper test score). Peer evaluation scores of respective domains were found to be significantly higher in PBL.
Conclusion
Medical students maintained their groupwork behaviors to some extent from early school to preclinical years. Those behaviors were positively related to their academic achievement in the later years of the medical education curriculum. Our study highlighted the importance of the early introduction of group work. The results will be useful to motivate medical students to put more effort into group work.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference43 articles.
1. General Medical Council. Outcomes for graduates (Tomorrow’s doctors). Manchester: General Medical Council; 2015. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/Outcomes_for_graduates_Jul_15_1216.pdf_61408029.pdf. Accessed: 14 Apr 2021
2. Smith KA, Sheppard SD, Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-based practices. J Eng Educ. 2005;94(1):87–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x.
3. Edmunds S, Brown G. Effective small group learning: AMEE Guide no. 48. Med Teach. 2010;32(9):715–26. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.505454.
4. Chūō kyōiku shingikai [Central Council for Education]. Atarashī jidai ni okeru kyōyō kyōiku no arikata ni tsuite (tōshin) [Liberal Arts Education in the New Era (Report)]. 2002. http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo0/toushin/020203/020203a.htm#08 (in Japanese). Accessed: 2 Apr 2019.
5. Ogasawara M. Status quo of the higher education in Europe and the United States of America (a quick report). J High Educ (Hokkaido Univ). 1996;1:293–5 (in Japanese).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献