Author:
Oudenampsen Jessica,van de Pol Marjolein,Blijlevens Nicole,Das Enny
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In order to best prepare medical students for their increasingly complex future career, interdisciplinary higher education is swiftly gaining popularity. However, the implementation of interdisciplinary learning in medical education is challenging. The present study deepens the understanding of the challenges and opportunities inherent to the implementation of an interdisciplinary course. We elucidated the attitudes and beliefs of students participating in a newly developed interdisciplinary minor, in which students of medicine (MS) and communication and information sciences (CISS) were involved.
Methods
We conducted four semi-structured focus group interviews, of which two were held before, and two were held after the course. Seven MS and six CISS participated voluntarily. A pre-arranged interview guide was used. The interviews were recorded and afterwards systematically analyzed with the ‘constant comparative analysis’ technique.
Results
The focus group interviews revealed three differences in epistemics between students in terms of 1) curriculum content, 2) educational formats and 3) student’s competence perceptions. These factors influenced the way students evaluated themselves, each other and the interdisciplinary course.
Conclusions
We conclude that factors that influence interdisciplinary learning are personal epistemics, individual learning preferences, and the synergy that is achieved throughout interdisciplinary learning. Organizing the dialogue among students of different disciplines could make students aware of inequalities, implicated biases and assigned status of different student groups. These empirical results are crucial to tailor interdisciplinary education to each specific discipline and to take interdisciplinary learning to a higher level of maturity.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference44 articles.
1. Spelt EJH, Biemans HJA, Tobi H, Luning PA, Mulder M. Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary higher education: a systematic review. Educ Psychol Rev. 2009;21(4):365–78.
2. Newell W. Interdisciplinarity in undergraduate general education. In: Frodeman JTKCM R, editor. The Oxford handbook on interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
3. Bradbeer J. Barriers to interdisciplinarity: disciplinary discourses and student learning. J Geogr High Educ. 1999;23(3):381–96.
4. Mansilla VB, Gardner H, Miller WC. On disciplinary lenses and interdisciplinary work. In: Wineburg SS, Grossman P, editors. Interdisciplinary curriculum: challenges to implementation. New York: Teachers College Press; 2000. p. 17–38.
5. Frost SH, Jean PM. Distances between Disciplines: Influences of Interdisciplinary. Discourse on Faculty Scholarship and Interaction at One University. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献