Abstract
Abstract
Background
The traditional teaching methods of dental education are gradually being replaced with futuristic education methods based on the usage of educational tools such as mannequin-based simulation models and virtual reality. However, the effectiveness of mannequin-based simulation models as a learning method in the field of oral surgery remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of training on a tooth extraction model (TEM) in view of undergraduate dental students’ experience and perception of their education.
Methods
A quasi-experimental trial was implemented with two consecutive year classes, totaling 136 students at the Dentistry Faculty of Altinbas University, Turkiye. Two cohorts were created from dental students in the classes of 2023 and 2022 graduates. Cohort 1 (n = 71) received 14 h of theoretical education followed by 10 h of preclinical education on TEM. Cohort 2 (n = 65) received only 14 h of theoretical education. An anonymous questionnaire was prepared with four main sections including the preferences of learning style, participants’ perceptions of the preclinical training methods, the students’ competency and free text comments. Students’ opinions were quantified with both 7-point Likert scales and thematic analysis. Anxiety levels were measured with the interval scale of anxiety response (ISAR). Descriptive statistics, inferential statistical and thematic analyses were conducted according to survey responses. Student characteristics were summarized and compared for two cohorts using a t-test. For all statistical analyses, the significance level was set atP ≤ 0.05.
Result
Cohort 1 was more comfortable with sequential motions performed with the forceps (P = 0.033) and felt more ready for their first clinical tooth extraction experience (P = 0.028). Cohort 2 showed a significantly higher preference for textbooks among supplementary materials (P = 0.04); however, they tended to exhibit lower self-confidence and higher anxiety levels, though without any statistical significance (P > 0.05).
Conclusion
It is clear that the students who have yet to start seeing patients benefit from increased practice with training models, which adequately reflect and represent real-life situations encountered in everyday practice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Kopel J, Brower G, Culberson JW. Teaching methods fostering enjoyment and creativity in medical education. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021;11(6):821–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2021.1979739.
2. Won J, Guan G, Mei L, et al. A multicenter study of dental curricula in Asia/Pacific nations: the views and experiences of final-year dental students. J Dent Educ. 2021;85(5):660–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12515.
3. Abulfaraj MM, Jeffers JM, Tackett S, et al. High-fidelity mannequin-based simulation: a pilot randomized trial evaluating learner performance. Cureus. 2021;13(8):17091. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17091.
4. Matome TJ, Jantjies M. Student perceptions of virtual reality in higher education. In: Ifenthaler D, Sampson DG, Isaías P, editors. Balancing the tension between digital technologies and learning sciences; cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2021. pp. 167–81.
5. Brand HS, Baart JA, Maas NE, Bachet I. Effect of a training model in local anesthesia teaching. J Dent Educ. 2010;74(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2010.74.8.tb04944.x.,876– 79.