Author:
Strausser Sarah A.,Dopke Kelly M.,Groff Destin,Boehmer Sue,Olympia Robert P.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
With the transition away from traditional numerical grades/scores, residency applicant factors such as service, research, leadership, and extra-curricular activities may become more critical in the application process.
Objective
To assess the importance of residency application factors reported by program directors (PDs), stratified by director demographics and specialty.
Method
A questionnaire was electronically distributed to 4241 residency PDs in 23 specialties during spring 2022 and included questions on PD demographics and 22 residency applicant factors, including demographics, academic history, research involvement, and extracurricular activities. Responses were measured using a Likert scale for importance. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square and Fisher exact test analysis were performed.
Results
767 questionnaires were completed (19% response rate). Across all specialties, the factor considered most important was the interview (99.5%). When stratified by specialty, surgical PDs were more likely to characterize class rank, letters of recommendation, research, presenting scholarly work, and involvement in collegiate sports as extremely important/very important (all p < 0.0001). In contrast, primary care PDs favored the proximity of the candidate’s hometown (p = 0.0002) and community service (p = 0.03). Mean importance of applicant factors also differed by PD age, gender, and ethnicity.
Conclusion
We have identified several residency application factors considered important by PDs, stratified by their specialty, demographics, and previous experiences. With the transition away from numerical grades/scores, medical students should be aware of the factors PDs consider important based on their chosen specialty. Our analysis may assist medical students in understanding the application and match process across various specialties.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference17 articles.
1. Examination Results and Scoring. United States Medical Licensing Examination. https://www.usmle.org/scores-transcripts/examination-results-and-scoring. Accessed 27 Feb 2024.
2. Results of the 2020 NRMP Program Director Survey. National Resident Matching Program. https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2020-PD-Survey.pdf (2020). Accessed 27 Feb 2024.
3. Curriculum Reports. American Association of Medical Colleges. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/curriculum-reports/report/curriculum-reports. Accessed 27 Feb 2024.
4. Results of the 2022 NRMP Program Director Survey. National Resident Matching Program. https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/PD-Survey-Report-2022_FINALrev.pdf (2022). Accessed 27 Feb 2024.
5. Wolfson RK, Fairchild PC, Bahner I, Baxa DM, Birnbaum DR, Chaudhry SI, et al. Residency Program directors’ views on Research Conducted during Medical School: A National Survey. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2023;98(10):1185–95.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献