Abstract
Abstract
Background
Staff shortages limit access to health services. The bidirectional benefits of allied health clinical placements are understood in the domains of student learning, health service delivery, and future workforce development. Still, the benefits to current workforce outcomes remain unknown. This review provides insights into the effects of allied health student placements in acute and primary care settings, particularly on healthcare staff's knowledge and procedural skills.
Methods
This search was based on the integrative review process established by Whittemore and Knafl in 2005. In October 2023, the first author (MH) searched five major electronic databases: Medline-EBSCO, PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus. The CLUSTER model was used to track additional references. The first three authors (MH, SM, and SC) were involved in screening, quality appraisal, and synthesis of the studies. Data were thematically synthesised and analysed.
Results
MeSH headings and keywords were used in key search areas: health education, health professional training, clinical placements, and allied health professions. The systematic search yielded 12 papers on allied health student placements across various healthcare settings in rural and metropolitan areas, with no high-quality methodologies measuring student placements' impact on staff knowledge and skills. Four main themes were identified from the analysis: meaningful student integration in service delivery, targeted educational support to healthcare staff, development of staff procedural skills and confidence, and the mechanisms of why student placements work in this aspect.
Conclusions
This review suggests that offering allied health student placement could be a promising approach to supporting rural healthcare staff in performing patient assessments and treatments proficiently and collaboratively. However, this requires further investigation to confirm.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural and remote health. Cat. no. PHE 255. Canberra: AIWH. 2023. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural-remote-australians/rural-and-remote-health
2. Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. A Summary of Final Report. Final Report Volume 1. 2022. Available at https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-03/final-report-executive-summary.pdf
3. Savy P, Warburton J, Hodgkin S. Challenges to the provision of community aged care services across rural Australia: perceptions of service managers. Rural Remote Health. 2017;17(2):1–1.
4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Older Australians. Health – Selected conditions. Canberra: AIWH. 2023. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/older-people/older-australia-at-a-glance/contents/health-functioning/health-disability-status
5. Calderone L, Bissett M, Molineux M. Understanding occupational therapy practice in residential aged care facilities under the aged care funding instrument: a qualitative study. Aust Occup Ther J. 2022;69(4):447–55.