Author:
Yin Rongrong,Yin Xueliang,Cui Mengdi,Xu Yinghan
Abstract
Abstract
Identifying important nodes is very crucial to design efficient communication networks or contain the spreading of information such as diseases and rumors. The problem is formulated as follows: given a network, which nodes are the more important? Most current studies did not incorporate the structure change as well as application features of a network. Aiming at the node importance evaluation in wireless sensor networks, a new method which ranks nodes according to their structural importance and performance impact is proposed. Namely, this method considers two aspects of the network, network structural characteristics and application requirements. This method integrates four indicators which reflect the node importance, namely, node degree, number of spanning trees, delay, and network energy consumption. Firstly, the changes in the four indicators are analyzed using the node deletion method. Then, the TOPSIS multi-attribute decision-making method is applied to merge these four evaluation indicators. On this basis, a more comprehensive evaluation method (MADME) for node importance is obtained. Theory study reveals MADME method saves computational time. And the simulation results show the superiority of the MADME method over various algorithms such as the N-Burt method, betweenness method, DEL-Node method, and IE-Matrix method. The accuracy of the evaluation can be improved, and the key nodes determined by the MADME method have a more obvious effect on the network performance. Our method can provide guidance on influential node identification in the network.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Instituto de Pesquisa Translacional em Saúde e Ambiente na Região Amazônica
China Scholarship Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Signal Processing
Reference31 articles.
1. Y. Zhang, W. Li, Modeling and energy consumption evaluation of a stochastic wireless sensor network. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 282, 2012 (2012)
2. J. Yick, B. Mukherjee, D. Ghosal, Wireless sensor network survey. Comput. Netw 52(12), 2292–2330 (2015)
3. W. Asif, H.K. Qureshi, M. M Rajarajan, M. Lestas, Combined Banzhaf & Diversity Index (CBDI) for critical node detection. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 64(C), 76–88 (2016)
4. K. Liu, S. Liu, Novel sensor node importance evaluation method based on the agglomeration contraction principle. J. Xidian Univ. 42, 90–96 (2015)
5. X.L. Ren, L.Y. Lv, Review of ranking nodes in complex networks. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 1175–1197 (2014)
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献