Abstract
AbstractThis study proposes a Geographic Information Systems-based methodology to measure accessibility to urban services from the elderly perspective to support urban planning processes. Specifically, it seeks to understand and clarify how the urban environment can influence the quality of life for older adults, mostly through pedestrian and public transport networks, locations of essential urban services, and the organisation of their resources. In light of a significant demographic change, policymakers will have to promote age-friendly urban planning approaches to guarantee equal access to services and activities. We propose a methodology to measure accessibility to healthcare provision services that considers land-use and mobility features and older adults' behavioural traits. The method belongs to the family of 2SFCA—2 steps floating catchment area—which evaluate accessibility as the combination of both supply and demand of urban services. Therefore, we have introduced innovative elements to shape actual mobility opportunities for the elderly and their travel choices. The methodology was applied to Milan's city to measure accessibility to the Health Protection Agency (ATS) services, which is responsible for healthcare assistance to the elderly dwelling in the city. The outputs show that a significant share of older people (almost 40%) suffer from poor accessibility to primary health services and that they mostly live in the city periphery. Moreover, the application to a case study has shown that the methodology could identify the critical aspects needed to aid urban planning to achieve a high quality of life for elderly people.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Automotive Engineering
Reference48 articles.
1. European Commission. (2020). Report on the impact of demographic change. Brussels. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/demography_report_2020_n.pdf.
2. Yin, C., He, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, W., & Gao, Y. (2018). Inequality of public health and its role in spatial accessibility to medical facilities in China. Applied Geography, 92, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.01.011
3. World Health Organization. (2015). Measuring the age-friendliness of cities: A guide to using core indicators https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/203830/9789241509695_esp.pdf;jsessionid=9191A5519E06944FDDAB786D22B80D91?sequence=1.
4. Solá, A. G., Vilhelmson, B., & Larsson, A. (2018). Understanding sustainable accessibility in urban planning: Themes of consensus, themes of tension. Journal of Transport Geography, 70, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.010
5. Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2) 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307.