Abstract
AbstractSeveral cities around the world rely on urban rail transit systems composed of interconnected lines, serving massive numbers of passengers on a daily basis. Accessing the location of passengers is essential to ensure the efficient and safe operation and planning of these systems. However, passenger route choices between origin and destination pairs are variable, depending on the subjective perception of travel and waiting times, required transfers, convenience factors, and on-site vehicle arrivals. This work proposes a robust methodology to estimate passenger route choices based only on automated fare collection data, i.e. without privacy-invasive sensors and monitoring devices. Unlike previous approaches, our method does not require precise train timetable information or prior route choice models, and is robust to unforeseen operational events like malfunctions and delays. Train arrival times are inferred from passenger volume spikes at the exit gates, and the likelihood of eligible routes per passenger estimated based on the alignment between vehicle location and the passenger timings of entrance and exit. Applying this approach to automated fare collection data in Lisbon, we find that while in most cases passengers preferred the route with the least transfers, there were a significant number of cases where the shorter distance was preferred. Our findings are valuable for decision support among rail operators in various aspects such as passenger traffic bottleneck resolution, train allocation and scheduling, and placement of services.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
INESC-ID
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Automotive Engineering
Reference24 articles.
1. Cerqueira, S., Henriques, R., & Arsénio, E. (2020). Integrative analysis of traffic and situational context data to support urban mobility planning integrative analysis of traffic and situational context data to support urban mobility planning. In European Transport Conference 2020. European transport conference 2020.
2. Cloud, B., Tarien, B., Liu, A., Shedd, T., Lin, X., Hubbard, M., Crawford, R. P., & Moore, J. K. (2019). Adaptive smartphone-based sensor fusion for estimating competitive rowing kinematic metrics Adaptive smartphone-based sensor fusion for estimating competitive rowing kinematic metrics. PloS One, 14(12), e0225690.
3. Corman, F., & Kecman, P. (2018). Stochastic prediction of train delays in real-time using Bayesian networks Stochastic prediction of train delays in real-time using bayesian networks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95, 599–615.
4. Cule, B., Goethals, B., Tassenoy, S., & Verboven, S. (2011). Mining train delays Mining train delays. In International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis International symposium on intelligent data analysis (pp. 113–124).
5. Daamen, W., Bovy, P. H., & Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2005). Influence of changes in level on passenger route choice in railway stations Influence of changes in level on passenger route choice in railway stations. Transportation Research Record, 1930(1), 12–20.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献