Abstract
Abstract
Background
Gaze is the primary way for pedestrians to obtain clues from traffic scenes before making decisions. Therefore, understanding pedestrian gaze pattern is vital for traffic safety in general and for the design of autonomous vehicles.
Methods
In this study, participants made road-crossing decisions in a naturalistic traffic scene, with an eye-tracker recording their gaze behaviors. We manually encoded the recorded videos with 14,898 fixations, and then analyzed the gaze pattern at three levels from general to specific: gaze towards overall scenes, gaze towards vehicles and gaze towards components of vehicles.
Findings
At the first level, our findings indicate that frequent fixations began to appear at the distance of 100 m and peaked around 5–30 m away from pedestrians. Transversely pedestrians mainly gazed at the two lanes adjacent to themselves. Pedestrians allocated 53% gaze duration to motor vehicles. For a specific vehicle, which is the second level, the gaze duration varied with vehicles' attributes such as distances, sizes, and types. Finally, at the third level, we discovered that pedestrians’ gaze duration on different vehicle components varied with the longitudinal distance. As vehicles approach, the main area of fixation expanded from the near side headlight to the whole front and near side, and finally shift to the near side of a vehicle.
Implications
The distribution of fixations in space and vehicle components before pedestrian crossing can provide fundamental information for understanding and modeling of pedestrian's road-crossing behaviors. In practice, our findings can guide the timing and position of information displays on autonomous vehicles to facilitate friendly interaction with pedestrians.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Automotive Engineering
Reference31 articles.
1. WHO. (2018). Global status report on road safety 2018 [R/OL]. [2020-10-04]. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/276462.
2. Lassarre, S., Papadimitriou, E., Yannis, G., & Golias, J. (2007). Measuring accident risk exposure for pedestrians in different micro-environments. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(6), 1226–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.009
3. Older, S. J., & Grayson, G. B. (1974). Perception and decision in the pedestrian task. Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
4. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
5. Jacob, R. J. K. (1991). The use of eye movements in human-computer interaction techniques: What you look at is what you get. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 9(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1145/123078.128728
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献