Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
We benchmark three European microscopic simulation software’s ability to reproduce congested patterns at merges and diverges by comparing their macroscopic outputs to validated analytical formulations. The capacity drop and, in the specific case of merges, the priority ratio are assessed. At the microscopic scale, the spatial distribution of lane changes at merges is examined.
Method
A single reference state is built for all three simulation tools. A point-based diverge and an extended merge are reproduced in the simulation tools. Under traffic conditions ranging from free-flow to congestion, vehicles counts and vehicles trajectories are collected to compute the selected indicators, which help to conclude for the considered reference state.
Results
The considered simulation tools correctly reproduce the merges and diverges elementary behaviors. However, their default configuration does not, entirely or partially, reproduce the traffic conditions induced by insertions and desertions as predicted by the analytical models.
Discussion
The study could be enriched by including the benchmark of other simulation tools. In addition, the networks studied are elementary and may not reflect completely the traffic situations encountered on the highways.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Automotive Engineering
Reference90 articles.
1. Meignan, D., Simonin, O., & Koukam, A. (2007). Simulation and evaluation of urban bus-networks using a multiagent approach. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 15, 659–671.
2. Yang, H., Ozbay, K., & Bartin, B. (2010). Application of simulation-based traffic conflict analysis for highway safety evaluation. In Proceedings of the 12th WCTR, Lisbon (Portugal).
3. Barceló, J. (Ed.). (2010). Fundamentals of traffic simulation. International series in operations research & management science. Springer.
4. Dowling, R., Skabardonis, A., Alexiadis, V., Wunderlich, K., Vasudevan, M., & Wang, P. (2019). Traffic analysis toolbox volume III: Guidelines for applying traffic microsimulation modeling software 2019. Update to the 2004 Version. Technical report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Operations. Publication number: FHWA-HOP-18-036.
5. Mansourianfar, M. H., & Haghshenas, H. (2018). Micro-scale sustainability assessment of infrastructure projects on urban transportation systems: Case study of Azadi district, Isfahan Iran. Cities, 72, 149–159.