Abstract
Abstract
Aim
This study identifies and compares perceptions of autonomous vehicle (AV) implementation among three Swedish stakeholder groups: Future Users, Urban Planners, and Developers.
Method
Semi-structured comparative focus groups were conducted separately with each of the three groups of stakeholders and the transcripts were analysed in broad themes using thematic analysis.
Results
Assumptions, hopes, concerns, and direction of development were the main themes that emerged from the analysis. Assumptions included electrification of vehicles, changes in travel demand, and the need for regulations; Hopes included the idea that AVs will contribute to a more accessible and safer transport system; Concerns included overtrust in AV technology, a possible detrimental impact on the city in the form of congestion and higher demand for investments in infrastructure that could outcompete other modes of transport; and Direction of development and their own role, where the need for collaboration between stakeholders and implementation of AVs in connection with society’s needs were emphasised.
Conclusions
AVs were seen to lead to both positive and negative consequences depending on implementation and the development of society. The study shows that dialogue between different stakeholders is lacking but it is desired for the inclusive implementation of AVs.
Funder
Chalmers Tekniska Högskola
Göteborgs Universitet
Chalmers University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Automotive Engineering
Reference43 articles.
1. Abraham, H., Seppelt, B., Mehler, B., & Reimer, B. (2017). What's in a name: Vehicle Technology Branding & Consumer Expectations for automation. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications. Oldenburg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3123018.
2. Anderson, J. M., Nidhi, K., Stanley, K. D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., & Oluwatola, O. A. (2016). Autonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR443-2.
3. Auvinen, H., & Tuominen, A. (2014). Future transport systems: Long-term visions and socio-technical transitions. European Transport Research Review, 6(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-014-0135-3.
4. Baker, R. T., & Wagner, J. (2013). Policy pathways to vehicle automation: Industry perspectives on the role of public policy in autonomous vehicle development. In Paper presented at the 2013 international conference on connected vehicles and expo (ICCVE).
5. Blömacher, K., Nöcker, G., & Huff, M. (2020). The evolution of mental models in relation to initial information while driving automated. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 68, 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.003.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献