Author:
Brady Louca-Mai,Miller Jacqueline,McFarlane-Rose Eleri,Noor Jasmine,Noor Rhianne,Dahlmann-Noor Annegret
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Children and young people’s (CYP) involvement is an increasing priority in UK healthcare and in heath research, alongside recognition that involving CYP in research requires different considerations to involving adults. Underpinned by children’s rights and a co-production ethos this paper, co-authored with young evaluators, explores the learning from a co-produced evaluation of eyeYPAG, a young persons’ research advisory group (YPAG) for eye and vision research based at Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Methods
A team of young evaluators, supported by the eyeYPAG facilitator, conducted focus groups and online surveys with YPAG members, their parents and carers, researchers, group facilitators and funders. Qualitative data was analysed using a collaborative reflexive thematic analysis approach. Quantitative data, limited by the small number of participants, was analysed in Excel and reported as descriptive data.
Results
CYP valued the social and creative aspects of the group as well as learning about research and developing skills and confidence. Learning was a two-way process, with both researchers and facilitators reflecting on how much they had learnt from working with the YPAG. All participants talked about the importance of impact, feeling that CYP are making a difference to research, as well as CYP’s right to be involved. Effective planning and facilitation were key to the success of the group, in relation to accessibility and the development and delivery of sessions both online and in-person. Resourcing and administration were key challenges to this, as was engaging researchers who were not already converted to the public involvement cause. As the nature of a YPAG is that it primarily focuses on advising researcher-led projects, co-production was identified as something that the group was ‘working towards’, including through this evaluation. Co-producing with CYP involves building up knowledge, confidence and acknowledging power dynamics.
Conclusions
Co-producing an evaluation enabled us to learn about the benefits and challenges of involving CYP in research, as well as how to involve them in the development of that evidence. An ethos of co-production and children’s rights helped to shift the balance of power and develop more engaging and inclusive ways of working.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Health Professions,Health (social science)
Reference38 articles.
1. Ashton E, et al. Evaluating eyeYPAG: a co-production project. London; 2021. Available at: https://generationr.org.uk/eyeypag-evaluation/.
2. Beresford P, et al. COVID-19 and co-production in health and social care research, policy, and practice volume 1: the challenges and necessity of co-production. Bristol: Policy Press; 2021. Available at: https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/covid-19-and-coproduction-in-health-and-social-care.
3. Brady L-M, et al. Participation at the heart: lessons from child-centred practice in UK healthcare during and beyond COVID-19. In: Frankel S, editor., et al., Establishing child centred practice in a changing world, part A. Emerald studies in child centred practice. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2022. p. 61–75.
4. Brady L-M, et al. Involving young people in drug and alcohol research. Drugs Alcohol Today. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-08-2017-0039.
5. Brady LM. Embedding young people’s participation in health services: new approaches. In: Brady LM, editor. Bristol: Policy Press; 2020a. Available at: https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/embedding-young-peoples-participation-in-health-services.