Author:
Michalak Erin E.,Cheung Iva W.,Willis Elsy,Hole Rachelle,Pomeroy Beverley,Morton Emma,Kanani Sahil S.,Barnes Steven J.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Current practices for engaging patients in patient-oriented research (POR) result in a narrow pool of patient perspectives being reflected in POR. This project aims to address gaps in methodological knowledge to foster diversity in POR, through the co-design and evaluation of a series of educational modules for health researchers in British Columbia, Canada.
Methods
Modules were co-created by a team of academic researchers and patient partners from hardly-reached communities. The modules are presented using the Tapestry Tool, an interactive, online educational platform. Our evaluation framework focused on engagement, content quality, and predicted behavior change. The User Engagement Scale short form (UES-SF) measured participants’ level of engagement with the modules. Survey evaluation items assessed the content within the modules and participants' perceptions of how the modules will impact their behavior. Evaluation items modeled on the theory of planned behavior, administered before and after viewing the modules, assessed the impact of the modules on participants’ perceptions of diversity in POR.
Results
Seventy-four health researchers evaluated the modules. Researchers’ engagement and ratings of module content were high. Subjective behavioral control over fostering diversity in POR increased significantly after viewing the modules.
Conclusions
Our results suggest the modules may be an engaging way to provide health researchers with tools and knowledge to increase diversity in health research. Future studies are needed to investigate best practices for engaging with communities not represented in this pilot project, such as children and youth, Indigenous Peoples, and Black communities. While educational interventions represent one route to increasing diversity in POR, individual efforts must occur in tandem with high-level changes that address systemic barriers to engagement.
Funder
Patient Engagement Methods Cluster, BC SUPPORT Unit
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Health Professions,Health (social science)
Reference42 articles.
1. Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research: Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Patient Engagement Framework. 2011. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/spor_framework-en.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2022.
2. Minogue V, Cooke M, Donskoy A-L, Vicary P, Wells B. Patient and public involvement in reducing health and care research waste. Res Involv Engagem. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0087-1.
3. Boote J, Baird W, Beecroft C. Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.007.
4. Brett JO, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, Suleman R. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x.
5. Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, Patel K, Wong JB, Leslie LK, Lau J. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.007.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献