Author:
Shahid Anmol,Lalani Inara N.,Rosgen Brianna K.,Sept Bonnie G.,Longmore Shelly,Parsons Leigh Jeanna,Stelfox Henry T.,Fiest Kirsten M.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Citizen engagement, or partnering with interested members of the public in health research, is becoming more common. While ongoing assessment of citizen engagement practices is considered important to its success, there is little clarity around aspects of citizen engagement that are important to assess (i.e., what to look for) and methods to assess (i.e., how to measure and/ or evaluate) citizen engagement in health research.
Methods
In this scoping review, we included peer-reviewed literature that focused primarily on method(s) to measure and/or evaluate citizen engagement in health research. Independently and in duplicate, we completed title and abstract screening and full-text screening and extracted data including document characteristics, citizen engagement definitions and goals, and methods to measure or evaluate citizen engagement (including characteristics of these methods).
Results
Our search yielded 16,762 records of which 33 records (31 peer-reviewed articles, one government report, one conference proceeding) met our inclusion criteria. Studies discussed engaging citizens (i.e., patients [n = 16], members of the public [n = 7], service users/consumers [n = 4], individuals from specific disease groups [n = 3]) in research processes. Reported methods of citizen engagement measurement and evaluation included frameworks, discussion-based methods (i.e., focus groups, interviews), survey-based methods (e.g., audits, questionnaires), and other methods (e.g., observation, prioritization tasks). Methods to measure and evaluate citizen engagement commonly focused on collecting perceptions of citizens and researchers on aspects of citizen engagement including empowerment, impact, respect, support, and value.
Discussion and conclusion
We found that methods to measure and/or evaluate citizen engagement in health research vary widely but share some similarities in aspect of citizen engagement considered important to measure or evaluate. These aspects could be used to devise a more standardized, modifiable, and widely applicable framework for measuring and evaluating citizen engagement in research.
Patient or public contribution
Two citizen team members were involved as equal partners in study design and interpretation of its findings.
Systematic review registration
Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/HZCBR).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Health Professions,Health (social science)
Reference79 articles.
1. Russell J, Fudge N, Greenhalgh T. The impact of public involvement in health research: what are we measuring? Why are we measuring it? Should we stop measuring it? Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:63.
2. Research CIoH. CIHR background: Government of Canada; 2019. https://letstalk-cihr.ca/about.
3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CIHR’s Framework for Citizen Engagement. Ottawa, ON; 2012.
4. Research CIoH. Health Research in Canada and You Ottawa, Canada2015 [updated 2015-01-12. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/43753.html.
5. The Value of Engagement Washington, DC: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; updated October 30, 2018. https://www.pcori.org/engagement/value-engagement.