Author:
Collins Cyleste C.,Hood Erika,Jewett-Tennant Jeri,Stange Kurt,Sehgal Ashwini R.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Although medical research dissemination is intended to benefit members of society, few members of society actually participate in the process of publishing findings. This study shares findings from community members’ (including patients and the public) experiences being trained as medical journal reviewers.
Methods
We analyzed findings from two focus group interviews of community reviewers (N = 29) to identify themes in their experiences with the training program.
Results
Community members trained as journal reviewers appreciated learning the context under which manuscript development and review occur from authors and funders, the value of the community member perspectives to science, and strengthened their critical thinking skills. A range of training tools and strategies included glossaries of research terms, creating review guides, practicing reviews, being trained by a supportive team, and working with and learning collaboratively.
Conclusions
Training as a journal reviewer has a positive impact on participating community members. Programs training community members as journal reviewers should incorporate guest speakers well-versed in community engaged research, group activities, a variety of training tools and materials, and highly supportive training teams.
Funder
National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Health Professions,Health (social science)
Reference34 articles.
1. Israel BA, Coombe CM, Cheezum RR, Schulz AJ, McGranaghan RJ, Lichtenstein R, et al. Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:2094–102.
2. Minkler M. Community-based research partnerships: challenges and opportunities. J Urban Health Bull N Y Acad Med. 2005;82:ii3-12.
3. Caron-Flinterman FJ, Broerse JEW, Teerling J, Bunders JFG. Patients’ priorities concerning health research: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands. Health Expect Int J Public Particip Health Care Health Policy. 2005;8:253–63.
4. Hewlett S, de Wit M, Richards P, Quest E, Hughes R, Heiberg T, et al. Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:676–80.
5. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献