Author:
Crooks Jodie,Flemming Kate,Shulman Caroline,Casey Emma,Hudson Briony
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Co-production of research aims to include people with lived experience of a phenomena throughout the research process. People experiencing homelessness often experience advance ill-health at a young age, yet access palliative care services at a disparately low rate to the level of palliative care need. The voices of people experiencing homelessness are infrequently heard throughout palliative care research, despite the complexities and intricacies of the area.
Aim
To explore the experiences of experts in the field to identify key context considerations for involving people with lived experience of homelessness in palliative and end of life care research.
Methods
Qualitative study comprising two data collection streams: interviews with professionals with experience of involving people experiencing homelessness in their work, and focus groups with people with lived experience (PWLE) of homelessness. Data were analysed using iterative, reflexive thematic analysis. Patient and Public Involvement contributors gave feedback on themes.
Results
A total of 27 participants took part in semi-structured interviews (N = 16; professionals) or focus groups (N = 11; PWLE homelessness). Key considerations of involving people experiencing homelessness in palliative and end of life care research were developed into four key themes: complexity of lived experience of homelessness; representation of homelessness within experts by experience; professionalising lived experience; and methods for involvement.
Conclusions
Involvement of people with lived experience of homelessness is important in developing palliative care research. This paper begins to outline some contextual considerations for promoting involvement in a complex and intricate field of research.
Funder
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Filipe A, Renedo A, Marston C. The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biol. 2017;15(5):e2001403.
2. Verschuere B, Brandsen T, Pestoff V. Co-production: the state of the art in research and the future agenda. VOLUNTAS: Int J Volunt Nonprofit Organiz. 2012;23:1083–101.
3. Price A, Clarke M, Staniszewska S, Chu L, Tembo D, Kirkpatrick M, Nelken Y. Patient and public involvement in research: a journey to co-production. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(4):1041–7.
4. Denegri S, Coldham T, Eglin S, Frost R, Kerridge L, Matthews R. Going the extra mile: improving the nation’s health and wellbeing through public involvement in research. London: NIHR; 2015.
5. Sandhu B. The value of lived experience in social change. 2017. Available at: http://thelivedexperience.org/report/
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献