Implementation and evaluation of participatory advisory boards in mental health research: a research protocol of the ‘PART-Beirat’ project

Author:

Ferra Fenia,Drewelow Eva,Klein Olga,Daum Marcel,Walde Peggy,Gerullis Kai,Kilimann Ingo,Tomlin Jack,Teipel Stefan,Völlm Birgit

Abstract

Abstract Background The use of participatory research approaches in the field of dementia and forensic mental health research has been on the rise. Advisory board structures, involving people with lived experience (PWLE), have frequently been used for guiding and leading research. Yet, there has been limited guidance on the establishment, retention and use of advisory boards in the field of dementia and forensic mental health research. Objective This project outlined in this research protocol will investigate the benefits and challenges of establishing three patient advisory boards, involving PWLE, practitioners and researchers with the purpose to guide research. Data will be used to develop guidelines for best practice in involving PWLE in dementia and forensic mental health research through advisory boards. Methods The research project will be divided into three phases: Phase I will involve two topic-specific systematic reviews on the use of participatory research with PWLE, followed by an initial study exploring PWLE’s, practitioners’ and researchers’ expectations on research involvement. Phase II will consist of the establishment of three advisory boards, one focusing on dementia, one on forensic mental health and one overarching coordinating advisory board, which will involve PWLE from both fields. Phase III, will consist of interviews and focus groups with advisory board members, exploring any challenges and benefits of involving PWLE and practitioners in advisory boards for guiding research. To capture the impact of involving PWLE in different research phases and tasks, interviews and focus groups will be conducted at four different points of time (0, 6, 12, 18 months). Reflexive thematic analysis will be used for the analysis of data. Discussion The project aims to explore the involvement of PWLE and practitioners in guiding research and aims to develop guidelines for best practice in establishing and using patient advisory boards in dementia and forensic mental health research and involving PWLE and practitioners in research.

Funder

Bosch Health Campus of the Robert Bosch Stiftung

Universitätsmedizin Rostock

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Health Professions,Health (social science)

Reference59 articles.

1. Aboaja A, Forsyth B, Bates H, Wood R. Involving service users to identify research priorities in a UK forensic mental health service. BJPsych Bull. 2021;45(6):321–6.

2. Archer M, Bhaskar R, Collier A, Lawson T, Norrie A, editors. Critical realism: Essential readings. London: Routledge; 1998.

3. Banongo E, Davies J, Godin P. Engaging service users in the evaluation and development of forensic mental health care services: a peer reviewed report to the funders. London, UK: City University London; 2006.

4. Bates P, Ward C. How to gain informed consent. Started Oct 2020, last amended 21 Dec 2022. https://peterbates.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/How-to-gain-informed-consent.pdf

5. Bhaskar R. A realist theory of science. 3rd ed. London: Verso; 2008.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3