Author:
Spuerck Inga,Stankovic Milos,Fatima Syeda Zeenat,Yilmas Elmas,Morgan Nicholas,Jacob Jenna,Edbrooke-Childs Julian,Vostanis Panos
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The involvement of young people as peer researchers, especially with lived experience, is increasingly considered important in youth mental health research. Yet, there is variation in the understanding of the role, and limited evidence on its implementation across different research systems. This case study focusses on the barriers and enablers of implementing peer researcher roles within and across majority world countries contexts.
Methods
Based on an international youth mental health project involving different levels of peer researchers and participants from eight countries, peer researchers and a co-ordinating career researcher reflect on lessons regarding enabling and challenging factors. These reflections are captured and integrated by a systematic insight analysis process.
Results
Building on existing international networks, it was feasible to actively involve peer researchers with lived experience in a multi-country mental health study, who in turn recruited and engaged young participants. Identified challenges include the terminology and definition of the role, cultural differences in mental health concepts, and consistency across countries and sites.
Discussion
Peer researchers’ role could be strengthened and mainstreamed in the future through ongoing international networks, training, sufficient planning, and active influence throughout the research process.
Trial registration: Not applicable.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Health Professions,Health (social science)
Reference48 articles.
1. Vaughn LM, Jacquez F. Participatory research methods: choice points in the research process. J Part Res Methods. 2020;1:1.
2. Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research. Ann Rev Pub Health. 2008;29:325–50.
3. Gillard S, Simons L, Turner K, Lucock M, Edwards C. Patient and public involvement in the coproduction of knowledge: reflection on the analysis of qualitative data in a mental health study. Qual Health Res. 2012;22:1126–37.
4. Health Service Executive Research and Development. Knowledge translation, dissemination, and impact: a practical guide for researchers. Guide No 8: patient and public involvement in HSE research. Research and development. Health Service Executive; 2021. Guide-no-8-Patient-and-Public-Involvement-in-HSE-Research.pdf (hseresearch.ie) Accessed 13 Apr 2023.
5. Lushey C. Peer research methodology. London: SAGE; 2017.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献