International youth mental health case study of peer researchers’ experiences

Author:

Spuerck Inga,Stankovic Milos,Fatima Syeda Zeenat,Yilmas Elmas,Morgan Nicholas,Jacob Jenna,Edbrooke-Childs Julian,Vostanis Panos

Abstract

Abstract Background The involvement of young people as peer researchers, especially with lived experience, is increasingly considered important in youth mental health research. Yet, there is variation in the understanding of the role, and limited evidence on its implementation across different research systems. This case study focusses on the barriers and enablers of implementing peer researcher roles within and across majority world countries contexts. Methods Based on an international youth mental health project involving different levels of peer researchers and participants from eight countries, peer researchers and a co-ordinating career researcher reflect on lessons regarding enabling and challenging factors. These reflections are captured and integrated by a systematic insight analysis process. Results Building on existing international networks, it was feasible to actively involve peer researchers with lived experience in a multi-country mental health study, who in turn recruited and engaged young participants. Identified challenges include the terminology and definition of the role, cultural differences in mental health concepts, and consistency across countries and sites. Discussion Peer researchers’ role could be strengthened and mainstreamed in the future through ongoing international networks, training, sufficient planning, and active influence throughout the research process. Trial registration: Not applicable.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Health Professions,Health (social science)

Reference48 articles.

1. Vaughn LM, Jacquez F. Participatory research methods: choice points in the research process. J Part Res Methods. 2020;1:1.

2. Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research. Ann Rev Pub Health. 2008;29:325–50.

3. Gillard S, Simons L, Turner K, Lucock M, Edwards C. Patient and public involvement in the coproduction of knowledge: reflection on the analysis of qualitative data in a mental health study. Qual Health Res. 2012;22:1126–37.

4. Health Service Executive Research and Development. Knowledge translation, dissemination, and impact: a practical guide for researchers. Guide No 8: patient and public involvement in HSE research. Research and development. Health Service Executive; 2021. Guide-no-8-Patient-and-Public-Involvement-in-HSE-Research.pdf (hseresearch.ie) Accessed 13 Apr 2023.

5. Lushey C. Peer research methodology. London: SAGE; 2017.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3