To what extent are patients involved in researching safety in acute mental healthcare?

Author:

Brierley-Jones Lyn,Ramsey Lauren,Canvin Krysia,Kendal Sarah,Baker JohnORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background There is a growing need to involve patients in the development of patient safety interventions. Mental health services, despite their strong history of patient involvement, have been slow to develop patient safety interventions, particularly in inpatient settings. Methods A systematic search was undertaken of both academic and grey literature. Whilst no lay member of the team worked directly on the review, they were part of the project steering group which provided oversight throughout the review process. This included people with lived experience of mental health services. From a research perspective the main focus for lay members was in co-producing the digital technology, the key project output. Smits et al.’s (Res Involv Engagem 6:1–30, 2020) Involvement Matrix was used to taxonomise levels of patient involvement. Studies were included if they were set in any inpatient mental health care context regardless of design. The quality of all selected studies was appraised using Mixed Methods Appraisal Methodology (MMAT). Results Fifty-two studies were classified, synthesised and their levels of patient involvement in the research and development of patient safety interventions were taxonomised. Almost two-thirds of studies (n = 33) researched reducing restrictive practices. Only four studies reported engaging patients in the research process as decision-makers, with the remaining studies divided almost equally between engaging patients in the research process as partners, advisors and co-thinkers. Just under half of all studies engaged patients in just one stage of the research process. Conclusion Involvement of patients in researching patient safety and developing interventions in an inpatient mental health context seems diverse in its nature. Researchers need to both more fully consider and better describe their approaches to involving patients in safety research in inpatient mental health. Doing so will likely lead to the development of higher quality safety interventions.

Funder

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Health Professions,Health (social science)

Reference108 articles.

1. World Health Organisation. Global action on patient safety. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2019.

2. World Health Organization, Conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety version 1.1: final technical report January 2009. World Health Organization; 2010.

3. Walshe K, Shortell SM. When things go wrong: how health care organizations deal with major failures. Health Affairs; 2017:23.

4. Seale B. Patients as partners. Building collaborative relationships among professionals, patients, carers and communities. London: The Kings Fund; 2016.

5. Wale J, et al. Why patients should be involved in health technology assessment. Int J Health Technol Assessment Health Care. 2017;33(1):1–4.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3