Transit-Time Volume Flow Measurements in Autogenous Femorodistal Bypass Surgery for Intraoperative Quality Control

Author:

Bosma Jan1,Minnee Robert C.1,Erdogan Deha1,Wisselink Willem1,Vahl Anco C.1

Affiliation:

1. *Department of Vascular Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; †Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ‡Department of Vascular Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess intraoperative transit-time volume flow measurements (VFMs) as a tool for intraoperative evaluation of lower extremity arterial bypass grafts and to predict their patency. We analyzed 273 consecutive patients who had an infrainguinal bypass procedure using the great saphenous vein from 1998 until 2008; 103 had an intraoperative VFM. All intraoperative revisions were recorded and analyzed. Patency and revision rates were compared between those receiving and those not receiving intraoperative VFM. Cox regression was used for analysis of predictors of patency. Primary patency at 1 and 2 years was 75 and 67%, respectively, in patients receiving intraoperative VFM versus 72 and 69% in those without VFM ( p = .79). In the VFM group, 12% had an immediate revision versus 6% without VFM ( p = .06). In the VFM group, 4% underwent revision to salvage the bypass within the first postoperative 30 days versus 6% without VFM ( p = .32). Patency was not associated with the use of VFM. Receiver operating characteristic curve was significant for occlusion at 30 days postoperatively but with a low predictive value ( p = .019,area under the curve 0.648). VFM may be helpful in selecting bypasses requiring immediate revision to prevent postoperative occlusion. The use of VFM is not significantly associated with patency.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3