Affiliation:
1. Bogomolets National Medical University
Abstract
The versatility of the internal university quality management system (QMS), based on the principles of TQM, provides not only continuous improvement of all processes of a modern higher educational institution. In the Bogomolets National Medical University it has become a link uniting the efforts of administration, faculty and student community on the way to updating and harmonizing the expectations of the society and the results of the training of future physicians. The process of forming students’ contingent is one of the essential elements of QMS. Particular attention to the terms of selection of university entrants determines the level of success of their academic performance, and a scientifically sound approach to the results of EIE at the entrance to university makes it possible to predict the results of internal and external evaluation. Basing on the comparative analysis, the informative value of the indicators of the EIE certificates of the Bogomolets National Medical University entrants has been established in order to predict the success of licensing integrated examinations «Krok 1» and «Krok 2» as the elements of external evaluation within the attestation of medical faculties graduates. Informativity of an EIE-indicator of three competitive subjects at level <150 points does not exceed the following for the EIE-indicator of biology, but the proportion of such students among the contingent was 5,4 times higher. The introduction of a limit for a minimum EIE-certificate score is one of the most effective tools of “contingent selection”. It will enhance the quality of training medical students according to the requests and expectations of all stakeholders. Guided by the obtained results, in 2017, the NMU introduced a limit of 140 points for the biology EIE-certificates, and in 2018 - a limit of 150 points for three competitive subjects.
Publisher
Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University
Reference7 articles.
1. Batechko, N., Lut, M. (2018). Systema menedjmentu yakosti vyschoi osvity: metodologichnyi aspect [Higher education quality management system: a methodological aspect]. Osvitologia, 7, 145–151. DOI: 10.28925/2226-3012.2018.7.145151 (ukr).
2. Hryshchuk, Yu. (2018). Systema vnutrishn’ogo zabezpechenn’a yakosti vyschoi osvity: dosvid Respubliky Pol’shcha [Internal quality assurance system of higher education: experience of the Republic of Poland]. Osvitologia, 7, 152–156. DOI: 10.28925/2226-3012.2018.7.152156 (ukr).
3. Ivanitska, O., Panchenko, A., Panchenko, G. (2017). Social’na vidpovidal’nist’ vyschogo navchal’nogo zakladu Ukrainy ta osnovni umovy ii dotrymannia [Social responsibility of higher educational institution and terms of its compliance in Ukraine]. Pedagogichnyi process: teoria i praktyka (seria: Pedagogika), 4 (59), 40–44. DOI: 10.28925/2078-1687.2017.4.4044 (ukr).
4. Linchevskyi, O. V., Chernenko, V. M., Piatnytskyi, Yu. S., Bulakh, I. Ye. (2017). Shliahy reformuvannia systemy vyschoi medychnoi osvity v Ukraini v suchasnyh umovah [The ways of higher medical education system reforming in Ukraine in the modern context]. Medychna osvita, 3, 6–9 (ukr).
5. Piatnytskyi, Yu. S., Bulakh, I. Ye., Melnyk, I. V., Mruha, M. R., Polishchuk, M. O., Voytenko, L. P. (2016). Nalezhna organizacia atestacii vypusknykiv – vajlyva skladova realizacii Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro vyshchu osvitu» [The proper organization of certification of graduates as an important component of the law of Ukraine «On higher education»]. Medychna osvita, 2, 50–53 (ukr).