Search for methodological benchmarks in humanitarian studies in the context of artistic pedagogy

Author:

Tusheva ViktoriyaORCID

Abstract

The article states that post-neoclassical rationalism, which is approved, not only significantly expands, but also complicates the worldview of a modern person, changes his outlook positions, causing the need to develop new methodological approaches and value-purpose objects in scientific knowledge. Today there was a need to rethink the issue of methodological benchmarks in the humanities research, which is actualized by the leading role of humanitarian knowledge in the socio-cultural development of modern society. To study this issue, the following research methods are used: analytical-synthetic, inductive-deductive and generalized, and modelling ones. On the basis of scientific reflection, the essence of methodological approaches in the humanities research, which are diversified and acquire new meaningful characteristics in the conditions of changing the paradigm of humanitarian knowledge, is considered. The theoretical and methodological positions in relation to the value dominant in humanitarian knowledge, which is oriented towards subjectivity and existentialism and provides in-depth reflection on artistic phenomena, are singled out. It is noted that in the humanitarian methodology the following research methods are found: ideographic method (research of individuals, events), methods of hermeneutics (interpretation of meaningful personal actions), qualitative analysis (understanding of the phenomenon, and not its calculation), method of phenomenology (knowledge of the causes and essence of artistic educational phenomena), methods of self-understanding, allowing to understand subjectity and spirituality of a person, humanitarian expertise, humanitarian design, existential dialogues, etc. The article outlines promising vectors of the epistemological environment of artistic pedagogy, which serve as the basis for developing new scientific strategies at the methodological, theoretical and methodical levels.

Publisher

Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference12 articles.

1. Andruschenko, V. P. (2008). Rozdumy pro osvitu: Statti, narysy, interviu [Reflections on Education: Articles, essays, interviews]. K.: Znannia Ukrainy, 819 (in Ukrainian).

2. Kraevskii, V. V. (2006). Metodologiya pedagogiki: novyiy etap [Methodology of pedagogy: a new stage]. M.: Izdatelskiy tsentr «Akademiya». 394 (in Russian).

3. Oleksiuk, O. M. (2016). Dynamika typiv naukovoi ratsionalnosti v rozvytku mistetskoi pedahohiky [Dynamics of Types of Scientific Rationality in the Development of Artistic Pedagogy]. K.: Kyiv. un-t im. B. Grinchenka, Muzychne mystetstvo v osvitolohichnomu dyskursi, 1, 3-7 (in Ukrainian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.28925/2518-766X2016137

4. Otich, O. (2015). Holistychna naukovo-mystetska paradihma osvity yak osnova efektyvnoho funktsionuvannia vyshchoi shkoly v Ukraini [The Holistic Scientific-artistic Paradigm of Education as the Basis for the Effective Functioning of Higher Education in Ukraine]. K.: Interservi, Vyshcha osvita Ukrainy: ryzyky, spodivannyia, uspikhy: monografiia , 132-165 (in Ukrainian).

5. Polonskyi, V. M. (2017). Bolshoi tematicheskii slovar po obrazovaniyiu i pedagogike [Large Thematic Dictionary on Education and Pedagogy]. M.: Narodnoie obrazovanie, 840 (in Russian).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3