Affiliation:
1. John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin Aleje Racławickie
Abstract
For many students and teachers working in online environments during the current pandemic crisis, the use of computers for educational testing is often an unavoidable predicament. This may be due to the fact that computer- based materials are not merely a useful addition to the learning and teaching resources, but rather the only option available. However, although in some contexts computers may indeed be a significant hindrance to test developers and test takers alike, they actually offer a number of substantial benefits.
It is also worth pointing out that, by and large, educational tests delivered through online platforms with the aim of measuring progress and achievement in learning have a lot in common with traditional paper-based tests. This article is thus an attempt at balancing the advantages and disadvantages of computerized testing with a view to finding out whether this mode of testing can be recommended as the preferred choice. Based mainly on a literature review of research and practice in the area of computerized and online educational testing, the paper provides a synthesis of key issues relevant to using electronic devices for the purpose of constructing, administering, and analyzing tests and assessments. In particular, the discussion focuses on the models of test administration, the merits and demerits of computer-assisted testing, the comparability of paper-based and computer-based test scores, as well as selected features of web-based testing systems, such as text-to-items converters, test generators, full-screen delivery mode, automated scoring (and human verification thereof), score reporting, feedback, as well as quantitative analysis of test scores. The article also puts forward some arguments in favour of developing one’s own testing application.
Publisher
Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University
Reference39 articles.
1. Alderson, J. C. (2000). Technology in testing: The present and the future. System, 28, 593-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00040-3
2. Bartram, D. (2006). Testing on the Internet: Issues, challenges and opportunities in the field of occupational assessment. In D. Bartram & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Computer-Based Testing and the Internet: Issues and Advances (pp. 13-37). Chichester, UK: Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9780470712993.CH1
3. Blazer, C. (2010). Computer-based assessments (Information Capsule Vol. 0918). Miami, FL: Miami-Dade County Public Schools.
4. Brown, J. D. (2016). Language testing and technology. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology (pp. 141-159). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315657899
5. Chalhoub-Deville, M. (1999). Preface. In M. Chalhoub-Deville (Ed.), Issues in Computer-Adaptive Testing of Reading Proficiency (pp. ix-xvi). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate and Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Implementation of Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) Using Expert System to Test Student Competencies in Higher Education;Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2022);2023