Abstract
The medieval composers of polytextual motets have been charged with rendering multiple texts inaudible by superimposing them. While the limited contemporary evidence provided by Jacobus’s comments in theSpeculum musicaeseems at first sight to suggest that medieval listeners would have had trouble understanding texts declaimed simultaneously, closer scrutiny reveals the opposite: that intelligibility was desirable, and linked to modes of performance. This article explores the ways in which 20th-century performance aesthetics and recording technologies have shaped current ideas about the polytextual motet. Recent studies in cognitive psychology suggest that human ability to perform auditory scene analysis—to focus on a given sound in a complicated auditory environment—is enhanced by directional listening and relatively dry acoustics. But the modern listener often encounters motets on recordings with heavy mixing and reverb. Furthermore, combinations of contrasting vocal timbres, which can help differentiate simultaneously sung texts, are precluded by a blended, uniform sound born jointly of English choir-school culture and modernist preferences propagated under the banner of authenticity. Scholarly accounts of motets that focus on sound over sense are often influenced, directly or indirectly, by such mediated listening.
Reference88 articles.
1. Abbate, Carolyn. 2004. “Music—Drastic or Gnostic?”Critical Inquiry30 (3): 505–36.
2. Alain, Claude, Karen Reinke, Yu He, Chenghua Wang, and Nancy Lobaugh. 2005. “Hearing Two Things at Once: Neurophysiological Indices of Speech Segregation and Identification.”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience17 (5): 811–18.
3. Atchison, Mary. 2005.The Chansonnier of Oxford Bodleian MS Douce 308: Essays and Complete Edition of Texts. Ashgate.
4. Bayat, Arash, Mohammad Farhadi, Akram Pourbakht, Hamed Sadjedi, Hesam Emamdjomeh, Mohammad Kamali, and Golshan Mirmomeni. 2013. “A Comparison of Auditory Perception in Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners: An Auditory Scene Analysis Study.”Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal15 (11).
5. Bent, Margaret. 1990. “A Note on the Dating of the Trémoïlle Manuscript.” InBeyond the Moon: Festschrift Luther Dittmer, ed. Luther A. Dittmer, Bryan Gillingham, and Paul Merkley, 217–42. Institute of Mediaeval Music.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献