Abstract
This study explored the comparative effects of traditional talk therapy (control group) and sandtray therapy (experiential group) on group dynamics within a true experimental design. Utilizing the Group Climate Questionnaire-Short Form (GCQ-S), we measured engagement, conflict, and avoidance among master’s level counseling students. Findings revealed a significant interaction between therapy type and time on the engagement subscale, with participants in the experiential group experiencing greater increases in engagement over time. These results underscore the potential of expressive modalities in altering group dynamics and enhancing the effectiveness of group therapy in counselor education.
Reference62 articles.
1. Anekstein, A. M., Hoskins, W. J., Astramovich, R. L., Garner, D., & Terry, J. (2014). Sandtray Supervision: Integrating supervision models and sandtray therapy. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 9(1), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2014.876885
2. Armstrong, S. A. (2008). Sandtray therapy: A humanistic approach. Ludic Press.
3. Association for Specialists in Group Work. (2021). Guiding principles for group work. https://asgw.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ASGW-Guiding-Principles-May-2021.pdf
4. Badenoch, B., & Cox, P. (2013). Integrating interpersonal neurobiology with group psychology. In B. Badenoch & S. P. Gantt (Eds.), The interpersonal neurobiology of group psychotherapy and group process. Routledge.
5. Bahrudin, S., & Ku Johari, K. S. (2020). The application of sandtray therapy in dealing with adult conflicts. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 5, 01–09. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.535001