Are Social Forums Withering Away ?

Author:

YILDIZ Neşe1

Affiliation:

1. Karabük Üniversitesi

Abstract

This study focuses on the Social Forums which were created in 2001 aiming to be the voice of anti-globalisation movement in a time of globalisation process against international organisations such as the WEF, the WTO, the IMF, the WB, and G7/G8 which are thought to be as pioneers, advocates and representatives of neo-liberal philosophy and understanding. After the existence of the World Social Forum-WSF, thematic forums, regional forums, and national and local forums were also created accordingly. All of the Social Forums have been developed as global action platforms that mobilize the masses around the world and reveal social principles against the globalisation order. This study aims to analyse and evaluate the effectiveness and transformation of social forums, especially the WSF taking the 21 years into account. This article argues that Social Forums formed a discourse, action and policy in their founding years, and nowadays they have lost their effectiveness and weakened especially in terms of mass participation, creating excitement and offering an alternative suitable to the motto "another world is possible". The method of this research consists of a literature review, conceptual analysis and the author’s observations by participation in some of the Social Forums. This study compiles many non-academic elements such as the documents and statements published as a result of the social forums and the views of the leading activists of the social forums and considers them from the academic perspective.

Publisher

OPUS - Uluslararasi Toplum Arastirmalari Dergisi

Reference43 articles.

1. Amin, S. (2004). Liberal virüs. F. Başkaya (Ed., Çev.), Özgür Üniversite Kitaplığı (Orijinal eserin basım tarihi 2004).

2. Amin, S. (2007). Apartheid global: Yeni emperyalizm ve global güney. 31 Mart 2007, https://m.bianet.org/bianet/emek/93951-apartheid-global-yeni-emperyalizm.

3. Bohman, J. (2002). How to make a social science practical: Prgmatism, critical social science and multipers, pectical theory. Millenium, 31(3), 499-524.

4. Bozkurt, V. (2000). Küreselleşme: Kavram, gelişim ve yaklaşımlar, küreselleşmenin insani yüzü. V. Bozkurt (Ed.) Alfa Yayınları, 17-32.

5. Brecher, J., Costello, T. & Smith B. (2002). Aşağıdan küreselleşme. (B. Kurt vd. Çev.) Aram Yayıncılık. (Orijinal eserin basım tarihi 2000).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3