Determinants of Society's Rape Myths Acceptance

Author:

SAHİN Derya1,GÜNER Özlem2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. SİNOP ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK YÜKSEKOKULU

2. SINOP UNIVERSITY, HEALTH ACADEMY, DEPARTMENT OF MIDWIFERY

Abstract

This study was planned to determine the acceptance status of rape myths in society and also the factors affecting this situation. The target population of this descriptive cross-sectional study consisted of individuals living in Turkey. Random sampling method was used in sample selection. It was determined that there were 268 individuals who met the research criteria. The research data were collected online via Google form between April 30, 2021 and January 30, 2022. "Personal Information Form" and "Illinois Rape Myths Acceptance Scale - Short form" were used as data collection tools. Descriptive statistical analyses, One-way ANOVA test, student t test and linear regression test were used to analyze the data. The mean age of the participants was 31.023+9.73 years. 42% of the participants were in the 28-37 age range and 59.9% of the participants were female. Gender, employment status, education level, place of residence and income status explained 28.7% of the acceptance of rape myths (p<0.001). It was determined that women accepted rape myths more than men, while the acceptance of rape myths was lower among low-educated participants. Within the scope of this study, it was determined that there are gender differences in the acceptance of rape myths and that the tendency to blame the victim is high. The results of this preliminary study are a reference for other researchers or institutions, and studies with a larger sample group are needed.

Publisher

OPUS - Uluslararasi Toplum Arastirmalari Dergisi

Reference38 articles.

1. Alptekin, D. (2014). Çelişik Duygularda Toplumsal Cinsiyet Ayrımcılığı Sorgusu: Üniversite Gençliğinin Cinsiyet Algısına Dair Bir Araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (32), 203-211.

2. Avezahra, M. H., & Chusniyah, T. (2022). The internalisation and normalisation process of rape myth acceptance: A qualitative study. Psychology Research on Education and Social Sciences, 3(2), 57-74.

3. Barnett, M. D., Sligar, K. B., & Wang, C. D. C. (2018). Religious Affiliation, Religiosity, Gender, and Rape Myth Acceptance: Feminist Theory and Rape Culture. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(8), 1219-1235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516665110

4. Baysan Arabacı, L., & Uygun, T. (2022). Şiddet Uygulayan ve Şiddet Uygulanan Bireylerin Özellikleri. Hemşirelik Bilimi Dergisi, 5(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.54189/hbd.948973

5. Bendixen, M., Henriksen, M., & Nøstdahl, R. K. (2014). Attitudes toward rape and attribution of responsibility to rape victims in a Norwegian community sample. Nordic Psychology, 66(3), 168-186.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3